Mary McAllen
Please do not delete referenced statements. We have a reliable reference (the national government—the same entity that defined these income classifications in the first place) that states that Naga City has no income classification yet. Also, Wikidata allows having multiple statements for each property as long as these are all reliably referenced. —seav (talk) 03:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
In your revert you stated: "why don't you find the answer instead of messing Wikipedia?" Earlier this month, I have already modified the PH wikidata template on the English Wikipedia to take into account novalue and unknown Wikidata statements for the income class. I don't agree that I am "messing Wikipedia". Please do reply on this talk page for further discussion instead of only reverting changes. —seav (talk) 00:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- It is obvious a typo mistake. Naga cannot have no government income for years. Naga's own official web shows the income classification. Yes, you are messing Wikipedia, but change wikidata. And you (and others) don't know how to build database, with codes and not descriptions. And do not think you are mother. Mary McAllen (talk) 11:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- "It is obvious a typo mistake."[Citation needed] Naga is not the only city that doesn't have an income class yet: There's also Borongan, Baybay, Mabalacat, Ilagan, Bacoor, Dasmariñas, Imus, Biñan, Cabuyao, and San Pedro. There are also several municipalities, mostly in ARMM, who don't have income classes yet. I don't agree with you that these are typos. I don't know why these LGUs do not have income classifications yet (maybe their Financial Statements still need to undergo an audit from the Commission on Audit or some other reason), but I expect most of them will get their classifications this year because income classifications are assessed every 4 years and the next reassessment cycle is for the average annual income for the years 2012–2015. Also as YMS stated, Wikidata allows multiple values for a property. Given all of these, I will consider your deletions to be a form of blanking which falls under Wikidata:Vandalism. Again, please do not delete values that have references, especially from sources considered reliable. —seav (talk) 12:50, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
When adding land area, please add the unit. Based on the values you are adding, the unit should be square kilometre (Q712226). —seav (talk) 23:49, 12 April 2016 (UTC)