User talk:Multichill/Archives/2013/November
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Succu in topic Bot generated taxons
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Excellent
The railway task force is an excellent idea - well done! good to see! cheers sats (talk) 06:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- I'm happy to hear you like it. I just finished adding adjacent station (P197) to all stations in the Netherlands. I hope other countries will follow. Multichill (talk) 22:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Den Haag Centraal
Sorry... I didn't even know what I did. At a certain point all the links disappeared (I am sure it was my fault but I didn't realize how I did) and I tried to rebuild them. I guess without success... Hypergio (talk) 19:38, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Bot generated taxons
Acting first, asking later? Please stop your bot untill we discussed the matter. --Succu (talk) 18:33, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- The adding of instance of? That's not up for discussion. Multichill (talk) 18:49, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Sure it is. One issue is monotypic taxon (Q310890). --Succu (talk) 18:54, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- That's a subclass so adding taxon (Q16521) is correct too. People can change it to the monotypic taxon (Q310890) to improve the item. Multichill (talk) 18:57, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- People like myself are not amused to repair bot errors. monotypic taxon (Q310890) has a special meaning in taxonomy an in our model. So please be not ignorant and stop this task. --Succu (talk) 19:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- That's a subclass so adding taxon (Q16521) is correct too. People can change it to the monotypic taxon (Q310890) to improve the item. Multichill (talk) 18:57, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Sure it is. One issue is monotypic taxon (Q310890). --Succu (talk) 18:54, 21 November 2013 (UTC)