Hi, I see that you have reverted my edit at Shirakaba Gakuen High School. May I ask why? 高等学校 means "senior high school" in English. Vi kunne godt tatt dette på norsk, men det er kanskje noen som ikke kan norsk som vil lese dette. Mvh., Mycomp
About this board
Welcome to Wikidata, Orf3us!
Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!
Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:
- Introduction – An introduction to the project.
- Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
- Community portal – The portal for community members.
- Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
- Project chat – Discussions about the project.
If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.
Previous discussion was archived aton 2016-03-27.
Shirakaba Gakuen High School
Hi! At the footer of the school's homepage http://www.shirakaba.ac.jp it says "Shirakabagakuen High School". There is a discussion of names in infoboxes from wikidata on the Norwegian Wikipedia where the word "senior" was discussed, which is why I tried to omit it. I have no strong feelings about this, but please accept my apology for the change.
No need to apologize :) In in the UK and Australia, sometimes "high school" is used in the names of schools for children aged from eleven to 18, so to avoid any misunderstanding it is best to have "senior", I think. And 高等学校 is a school for grades 10-12 only. Many Japanese are not aware of this, and use the American English "high school" instead of "senior high school". Ha en fin helg! Mycomp
For items describing humans, please use sex or gender (P21). Thanks!instead of, for example, . That information needs to be stored in
Thank you for telling me, I have changed my last edits, and I hope I did it right.
P18 for people items
Hi, note that not all images are suitable to be used as image (P18) in people items. There are more specific properties for images not showing the person, like coat of arms image (P94) or image of grave (P1442), so it is much better to add them to the specific properties and not as image (P18).
Hi Jklamo, that is perfectly correct. Now the items that you have reversed are being used in a Norwegian infobox and since there is no other proper picture of these persons I have chosen to use their coat of arms. One day someone hopefully will upload a proper picture of these persons and the coat of arms can be exchanged. I see that you have now removed and changed the picture to "no value" which has resulted in an error-message in the Norwegian infoboxes on the Norwegian wikipedia saying: "[[Fil:Lua-feil i Modul:WikidataBilde, linje 62: attempt to index field 'datavalue' (a nil value).||frameless]]". If you really find this neccessary, I will remove the infoboxes from these articles so that they we will not have to look at error-messages in the infoboxes. That is of course a shame, since wikidata is a really helpful tool. Regards,
Hi, I understand, but currently there is no consensus to add these pictures as P18, mainly users from dewiki are very sensitive about this issue and removing all pictures like that (coat of arms, graves without portrait, etc.). P18 is very popular property and it is not easy to satisfy users from multiple wikis. As result for some items there are multiple adds and removes conducted by distinctive users, novalue is a bit dirty way to prevent these behaviour.
Instead of removing infoboxes I recommend to modify infobox code in your wiki to be able to handle novalue and even show P94 or P1442 in case, where there is not P18 (or there is novalue) in the items. That is the far more cleanest way to deal with this. You can remove novalue as well (I will not revert that change), but if you replace it with coa picture be prepared that someone other may remove it in future.
Thank you for your answer. I have seen on your discussion page that someone is concerned about this issue, and you are now continuing that procedure. Alternatively I can just add the coat of arms picture in the local infobox, but if someone then uploads a proper picture in the future unfortunately it will not be changed. The "no value" gives an error-message in the infoboxes on NO.wikipedia, so that will have to be fixed. Is there consensus on adding "no value" to P18? Regards
Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey
(That message in other languages: العربية • bosanski • català • Deutsch • Esperanto • français • עברית • polski • português • português do Brasil • русский • اردو • 中文 – translate that message)
Like some other community members, you are using Flow.
An increasing number of communities now use Flow or are considering it. Although Flow itself is not scheduled for major development during 2016 fiscal year, the Collaboration Team remains interested in the project and in providing an improved system for structured discussions.
You can help us make decisions about the way forward in this area by sharing your thoughts about Flow — what works, doesn't work or should be improved?
Thanks for your ideas and opinions about Flow!
There are no older topics