User talk:Vladis13/Archive

English interwikis

You said: "All en-interwiki is errorios, because lead to translates from items of works Plato. To best fix them"

No, the interwikis at en-Wikisource are correct. The links at Wikidata and the links at Wikisource do different things. Wikisource does not follow the same policies for interwikis that Wikidata follows. en-Wikisource reatins the interwikis precisely because Wikidata does not support interwikis between Wikisource translations of the same work, and that is why en-wikisource has a different policy about linking than Wikidata.

In future, please do not remove these interwiki links from Wikisource. Also, do not add incorrect linkages to Wikidata items, as you repeatedly did today, nor accuse people who correct your mistakes of "vandalism". --EncycloPetey (talk) 20:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

• No, you mistakes and doing administration vandalism:

1) In en-wikisource you reverted interwiki of the work "Parmenides" of author Plato to other author Parmenides. It’s error, work name and other man is not synonyms. For my fix it you block me on month in en-wikisource.

2) Interwiki moved to Wikidata. If you not know what is interwiki read wiki Help. Items in WD makes for 1 edition or translation. I not enough speak on English for talk about, see Help and commons practice in language wikisources.

3) At the same time, You set in item of work of Plato, interwiki to translation of Benjamin Jowett, and translation of Karpov. It's not synonyms. This again error and vandalism.

4) Then you reverted interwiki, I give you link to Rules, but you reverted again.

Note: that now ru:Parmenides is not redirect. I very ask you stop vandalism, please.

No, All interwikies in en-wikisource is errorious, I today saw them. E.g. first now open: [1] - from item of translation of Plato, interwikies to work Plato and to other translations. To best you could to fix interwikies in your en-wikisource. Vladis13 (talk) 21:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

(1) I'm sorry that you don't understand how your edits were mistakes. (2) I'm sorry you don't understand the difference between Wikidata interwikis and Wikisource interwikis. (3) same as #2. (4) I'm sorry you don't understand the rules. (5) The ru.wikisource link was I redirect when I removed the link. You changed it only after I removed the link. (6) The en-Wikisource interwikis are not wrong, and again, I'm sorry you do not understand why. --EncycloPetey (talk) 22:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

EncycloPetey, give link to Rule, please, about differences the interwiki rules in en-Wikisource from the interwiki rules on ALL Wikimedia Projects? Without this Rule, your words is only attempt to justify vandalism. --Vladis13 (talk) 23:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Until you are willing to acknowledge your own mistakes [2], and to assume good faith, there is no point in discussing anything more with you. I hope you learn to avoid making these same mistakes in future. --EncycloPetey (talk) 23:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

@EncycloPetey: Ok, you don't have Rules, so you above said only fantastic and only deaf attempt to justify your vandalism. Looks funny link to assume good faith from user which blocked me for 1 month for first correction of the clearly erroneous link. --Vladis13 (talk) 23:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

You were not blocked for "first correction". You were blocked because you removed interwiki links (including correct ones), then you were warned by an admin not to do this, and then you reverted the admin's edit. That constitutes deliberate vandalism, and is why you were blocked. I assumed the first edit was good faith and a simple mistake, but when you repeat the edit after being warned by an admin not to do that, assuming good faith is no longer possible. Since it is clear that you have your own agenda, your own rules, and will not be learning from your mistakes, we'll go ahead and make your block indefinite. --EncycloPetey (talk) 00:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

@EncycloPetey: it's a lie. All can be see in history edits. 1) My fix you reject without comment(!), 2) I reverted the clearly error with my comment and double it on may Talkpage, 3) You immediately block me. No "warned", no "warned that you are admin", on 1 month with comment "Disruptive editing: deleting interwiki links".

4) And now, when I ask give link to Rules to confirm your words, you block me indefinite, with the prohibition edit my Talkpage... (And you talk me about assume good faith...) --Vladis13 (talk) 00:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

History:

(1) 08:42 You deleted the links [3]

(2) 10:42 You were warned [4]

(3) 10:49 You reverted despite warning [5]

(4) 11:27 You were blocked

Hope this helps. --EncycloPetey (talk) 01:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Here is banned edit. - there reverted incorrect wikilinks and el-wikilink that moved to WD. It's vandalism, block for it is using admin.rights for vandalism.

@EncycloPetey: please, 1) give link that work of Plato "Parmenides" and other man Parménides de Elea is synonyms. 2) And give Rule that need block for removing doublicate el-interwiki that already have on WD. --Vladis13 (talk) 15:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)