আন্তর্জাতিক সংগ্রহশালা দিবস ডাটাথন ২০২৩-এর সনদপত্রের জন্য তথ্য প্রদানের অনুরোধ edit

প্রিয় Yahya,
আশা করি ভালো আছেন। বিগত ২০২৩ সালের ১৮ মে উইকিউপাত্তে আয়োজিত আন্তর্জাতিক সংগ্রহশালা দিবস ডাটাথন ২০২৩-এ অবদান রেখে উইকিউপাত্তের তথ্যসম্ভারকে আরও সমৃদ্ধ করতে আপনার অমূল্য প্রয়াসের জন্য আন্তরিক ধন্যবাদ ও কৃতজ্ঞতা জানবেন।

এই আয়োজনের একজন অংশগ্রহণকারী হিসেবে আপনার প্রাপ্য ডিজিটাল সনদপত্রটি প্রদানের জন্য আমাদের কিছু তথ্য প্রয়োজন। অনুগ্রহ করে এই ফর্মটি পূরণ করে আমাদের পরবর্তী কার্যক্রম সম্পন্ন করতে সহযোগিতা করুন। যদি আপনি ইতোমধ্যেই ফর্মটি পূরণ করে থাকেন, তাহলে দয়া করে দ্বিতীয়বার পূরণ করবেন না।

শুভেচ্ছান্তে,
মহীন
সংগঠক, আন্তর্জাতিক সংগ্রহশালা দিবস ডাটাথন ২০২৩
১৪:০৯, ২৩ মে ২০২৩ (ইউটিসি)

Wikidata weekly summary #587 edit

Edit group QSv2/59899

Summary {{{summary}}} Author Yahya
Number of edits 13,336 (more statistics) Example edit Q40054006

Discussion edit

@Yahya: ভাই, এই ব্যাচে আপনি sex or gender (P21) --> male (Q6581097)/female (Q6581072) সবার ক্ষেত্রেই "অভিনেতা" বিবরণ যুক্ত করছেন। কিন্তু অভিনেতা একটা পুরুষবাচক শব্দ, তাই sex or gender (P21) --> female (Q6581072) এর জন্য "অভিনেতা" বিবরণ ব্যবহার করা ঠিক হচ্ছে না বলে মনে হচ্ছে। আমার মনেহয় এগুলো পরিবর্তন করে "অভিনেত্রী" দেয়া উচিত। অথবা সবার ক্ষেত্রে নিরপেক্ষ শব্দ "অভিনয়শিল্পী" ব্যবহার করা যেতে পারে। — Haseeb (talk) 09:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Haseeb55 আপনি নিশ্চিত female (Q6581072) এর ক্ষেত্রেও অভিনেত্রী যোগ করেছি? অনুগ্রহ করে উদাহরণ দিন। যেহেতু এটা অনেক আগের কাজ, তাই এখন মনে করতে পারছি না কোন মানদণ্ডের ভিত্তিতে এটা অভিনেতা/অভিনেত্রী নির্ধারণ করেছিলাম। তবে আমি এলোমেলোভাবে কয়েকটা যাচাই করে দেখলাম সবকটিই male (Q6581097). —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 10:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
আচ্ছা, এরকম কয়েকটি পেয়েছি। সময় করে ঠিক করবো। লক্ষ্য করার জন্য ধন্যবাদ। —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 11:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
সম্পন্ন। —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 09:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Global Blacklist edit

Could you please remove the linktr.ee URLs from these items? https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?limit=500&offset=0&profile=default&search=linktr.ee&title=Special:Search&ns0=1&ns120=1&searchToken=f3y89j1eevhbmp61kz7k3tmpp Trade (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Trade Almost done. Only a few left. —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 15:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why did you delete Q123503526? edit

I think Q123503526 (which you just deleted) meets notability policy #2, can you explain a bit more why you deleted it? If Miraheze wikis cannot get wikidata items, then how come this isn't deleted? I'm new to this wikidata stuff, and I find it kinda rude you just straight up deleted it when I didn't even finish putting all the info. Wekeedatakool (talk) 14:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I apologize if my actions seemed rude. Could you please clarify how the item aligns with WD:N#2? —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 15:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The item is Astronomy Wiki, a public wiki, which (I think) is a clearly identifiable entity and has public references. Wekeedatakool (talk) 15:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Could you provide serious and publicly available references? If the item meets the policy, I'll be happy to restore it. —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 15:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, the wiki and the wikis wiki page. I couldn't put the URL into the item itself because an abuse filter blocked me for some reason Wekeedatakool (talk) 15:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Making items about your own Wiki's is usually frowned upon on Wikidata Trade (talk) 15:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Why though? Wekeedatakool (talk) 23:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If the Anpang account belongs to you, the links you provided are all primary sources, which are not considered serious references. —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 16:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The wikistats page? Wekeedatakool (talk) 23:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No. —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 13:02, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Why not?
Also, I just did the same trick as this and made a commons category to be referenced, so now it passes notability #1. Wekeedatakool (talk) 13:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello? Wekeedatakool (talk) 13:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Adding a Commons category as a sitelink doesn’t make it notable. The item 'Monarquia Wiki' has also been deleted by another admin. —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 13:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well that only happened after I pointed it out, and there's a lot more of these Miraheze wikis items. Just search "miraheze" and scroll down, there's tens. If Miraheze wikis are considered unnotable regardless of the policy, then maybe you can delete all of them. And really, why is adding a sitelink not make it notable? It literally passes #1. Or the wikistats page - you still haven't explained why that's not a "serious" reference. Wekeedatakool (talk) 14:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
'It's a Miraheze site, so it's not notable,' is not the case. Miraheze sites may also be notable if the policy criteria are met. If you believe an item does not meet the Notability guidelines, you can nominate it for deletion.
Why does adding a sitelink not make it notable? A: Please read the entire page. I already mentioned, 'Adding only a Commons category as a sitelink doesn’t make an item notable.'
Wikistat is not a reliable source because it's a directory site. Every public Miraheze site is listed here, and anyone can create a Miraheze site. Please refer to WD:S and Wikidata:Verifiability to learn more about sources/references.
Why are you using multiple accounts (I found at least 4)? Creating a new account to promote your own site may not be a legitimate use of alternate accounts. —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 16:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Does that mean that like, literally all wikis on wikifarm can and should be deleted?
Heck, this has been sitting here untouched for 9 years, and it has 2 statements and doesn't follow any of the notability policy. It links to a Wikipedia page, but it's about the entire community, not the Fandom wiki, and the page doesn't say anything about the Fandom wiki. And the item is about the Fandom wiki and not the Fandom itself because the Freebase ID links to the Fandom wiki. Now since that's notable, can't I just link my item to the wikipedia page for Astronomy and suddenly it'll be notable? And if for some reason the statement's actually wrong (it might be, other statement says it's a fandom), then there's still so many examples of wiki items which don't follow the notability policy.
Also, question, why was my item deleted minutes after creation but Monarquia was there for months, well, until after I mentioned it here? Was it just because the admins missed it? Eeehhh..
I'm on User:Ohnoiforgotmypass on Chrome and this account on Kiwi Browser, I also had User:BoxOfNotes on the Wikipedia android app but I forgot the password and can't reset it for some reason. I also have User:BoxAP, and I have User:Anpang01 on a laptop which I don't have right now. And probably a lot more throwaway accounts.
When I put that post, I accidentally used Chrome so it was signed by the Ohnoiforgotmypass account, so I went to Kiwi and put more content and changed the signature. Wekeedatakool (talk) 05:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Semi-protection request edit

ভাই Khaleda Zia (Q234814) পাতায় সেমি-প্রোটেকশন লাগবে, আর পাতার পূর্বের সংস্করণ লুক্কায়িত করা উচিত। নির্বাচনের জন্য বাংলাদেশী রাজনৈতিক আইটেমগুলা এখন স্বাভাবিক ভাবেই বেশি সার্চ হবে, তাই তুলনামূলক অধিক গুরুত্বপূর্ণ ব্যক্তি ও দলের আইটেমগুলাতে ধ্বংসপ্রবণতা রোধে ৩-৪ মাসের জন্য সেমি-প্রোটেকশন দিয়ে রাখলে ভালো হয়। — Haseeb (talk) 12:32, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  করেছি। জানানোর জন্য ধন্যবাদ। —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 13:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]