Wikidata:Lexicographical data/Universal Dependencies/Mappings

IMPORTANT: to make the diagrams in this page render properly, add importScript('User:Mahir256/syndepgraph.js'); to your common.js (or load it some other way).

This page lists mappings of dependency relations (both the universal syntactic relations and the relation subtypes to Wikidata items used with syntactic dependency head relationship (P9763). Examples will be given for each relation type, and for each equivalent as much as possible.

Only mappings of UDv2 syntactic relations to values of P9763 are discussed here. While UD also defines part-of-speech tags and features, they will not be given analogues (as lexical categories and grammatical features on forms respectively) here.

Where possible, use the equivalent for an appropriate subtype listed below:

Where possible, use an appropriate item from the ones listed at Wikidata:Lexicographical data/Universal Dependencies/Phrase types.

Below are some equivalents for certain subtypes of the 'advcl' relation:

Where possible, use the equivalent for an appropriate subtype listed below:

  • adverb of negation (Q55965107) may be used for general negative particles. (Those which carry information that, for otherwise positive sentences, would be present on the verb itself, should use an equivalent of aux:neg to be determined.)
  • auxiliary verb (Q465800) may be used with auxiliary verbs. Non-verb carriers of tense/aspect/mood/evidentiality may use other items not listed here.

A number of possibilities exist:

Where possible, use the equivalent for an appropriate subtype.

Where possible, use the equivalent for an appropriate subtype listed below:

Other types of reduplication (that do not involve words which cannot themselves stand alone) might use something general like reduplication (Q221446).

It is enough to use nominal compound (Q1995936) once the dependent is qualified with a object form (P5548) value for the construct-state form.

Just as UD recommends avoiding using this relationship, so too here it is recommended to be avoided, and no item equivalent shall be given for it now. If there is a compelling reason to retain it, please provide an example on this page's talk page.

  • multiword expression (Q6935164) may be used here in the general case; since there are other types of multiword expressions that are not flat, a better relation item is to be determined.

Where possible, use the equivalent for an appropriate subtype listed below:

It is recommended instead that text in one language appearing in a particular lexeme for another language, which might otherwise use this relation, instead be annotated with respect to the language of the foreign text.

  • name (Q82799) or an appropriate subclass thereof might be used here.

A number of possibilities exist:

Where possible, use the equivalent for an appropriate subtype.

Where possible, use the equivalent for an appropriate subtype listed below:

Where possible, use the equivalent for an appropriate subtype below:

Where possible, use an appropriate item from the ones listed at Wikidata:Lexicographical data/Universal Dependencies/Phrase types.

Below are some equivalents for certain subtypes of the 'obl' relation:

(See obl:cmp above.)

(See obl:cmp above.)

Where possible, use the equivalent for an appropriate subtype listed below:

(See parataxis:obj above.)

Although punctuation is simply handled through direct attachment to some suitable phrasal root, it is unresolved whether using lexemes for punctuation in "combines" values is necessary for lexemes on Wikidata, and so no equivalent is being provided at the moment.