Wikidata:Property proposal/ISCED Broad Field

ISCED Broad Field

This property was requested after extensive consultation with the Wikidata community and experts on ed tech, OER, global and national curriculum, education policy, and digitization. Over the two rounds of the consultation, we received input from 31 individuals representing various global perspectives and areas of expertise to aid in the full implementation of the Wikidata for Education project.

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

Withdrawn

Description	Identifies the specific ISCED broad field. It uses the code and label.
Data type	Item
Domain	property
Example 1	journalism (Q11030) → 03 Social sciences, journalism and information
Example 2	physical sciences (Q14632398) → 05 Natural Sciences, mathematics and statistics
Example 3	accounting (Q4116214) → 04 Business, Administration and Law
Planned use	A reference to the ISCED Level. This is part of a project where the curricula is digitized onto Wikidata. Read more about WD4E Data Model Document v1.0
Wikidata project	Wikidata for Education

Motivation

This property will be used to specify the specific field that a curriculum belongs to. Broad fields are bigger than narrow and detailed fields. These classifications will aid in making comparisons and also making observations on how biased curricula of a specific educational level, or country may be towards a specific field of discipline.

This will allow comparison of a local education level with the ISCED standard. This is helpful so educationists can relate with standards to manage pedagogy and education outcomes. Usually educationists are able to relate their local education system with a global standard unlike other local standards. Hence, with this addition, an educationist is able to take a look at another local standard and because it has been compared with the ISCED standard, they are able to relate.

In the example,accounting (Q4116214) is categorized in ISCED Broad Field as Business, Administration and Law. The same applies to the rest. For more information about ISCED check this document

Dnshitobu (talk) 14:16, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Strong supportAbubakar280 (talk) 23:47, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong supportAmuzujoe (talk) 13:16, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong supportWarmglow (talk) 15:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong supportOladipupo193 (talk) 07:49, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The property is not ready because it currently does not have valid examples. The examples don't tell us which item is supposed to get a statement to refer to which other item. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 09:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ChristianKl The examples have been improved upon. You can come and take a look Dnshitobu (talk) 13:37, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking time to review our request. We have had some discussions with the advisory and we are no longer going forward with this request. We truly appreciate the comments because it has helped shaped the project for good. Dnshitobu (talk) 23:33, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dnshitobu do I understand it right, that it's your intention to withdraw this cluster of property proposals? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 11:58, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ChristianKlWe are withdrawing some of the properties and I will review the status. Thank you for the support Dnshitobu (talk) 13:06, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]