Wikidata:Property proposal/Related Categories

Not done

Description	تصانيف متعلقة بهذا العنصر (ar) – (Please translate this into English.)
Data type	Item
Allowed values	Wikimedia category (Q4167836)
Example	stroke (Q12202) > Category:Deaths from stroke (Q6509490) > Qualifier:Pxx : Q28122609 malaria (Q12156) > Category:Deaths from malaria (Q8366341) > Qualifier:Pxx : Q28122609 HIV/AIDS (Q12199) > Category:Deaths from AIDS-related illness (Q7215785) > Qualifier:Pxx : Q28122609 tuberculosis (Q12204) > Category:Deaths from tuberculosis (Q7214827) > Qualifier:Pxx : Q28122609
See also	website account on (P553)

I created these proposal after the discussion in previous proposal Wikidata:Property proposal/Category_for_people_deaths_by_this_disease and I think these is the better way.

Another example can be like :

item: Academy Award for Best Director (Q103360)
- value:Category:Best Directing Academy Award winners (Q7146100)
  - Qualifier:Pxx : human (Q5) or new item related to it.
- value:Category:Films whose director won the Best Directing Academy Award (Q8458263)
  - Qualifier:Pxx : film (Q11424) or new item related to it.
We can use it to do any type of autocategorise with specific item in mandatory qualifier. this way can work on award holders, deaths places, births places, and may things. --Mr. Ibrahem (talk) 15:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Just two points:
  1. "Related categories" might be too broad as name. "autocategorization" might work. It can be a parent property for, e.g. Template:(P
  2. you might want to link the applicable property as a qualifier-value. related property (P1659) can do.
    Sample: tuberculosis (Q12204) > Category:Deaths from tuberculosis (Q7214827) > related property (P1659) cause of death (P509).
    Ideally, it should be possible to check these to ensure that the categorization applies.

Given these changes, I'd try to reformulate one along this.
--- Jura 07:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per my comments in the previous thread linked; and additionally, this is not structured data. --Izno (talk) 19:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Izno; and per previous discussion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr. Ibrahem, Pigsonthewing, Jura1, Izno: Not done, because there's no support and two votes against 2 months after proposal creation. ChristianKl (talk) 19:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]