Wikidata:Property proposal/aspect
grammatical aspect
editOriginally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Lexemes
Description | grammatical category that expresses how an action, event or state, denoted by a verb, relates to the flow of time: perfective, progressive, prospective, habitual, etc. |
---|---|
Represents | grammatical aspect (Q208084) |
Data type | Item |
Domain | lexeme / form |
Allowed values | perfective (Q1424306), imperfective (Q371427), progressive (Q1423674), prospective (Q7250831), habitual (Q5636904) and others |
Example 1 | odlesnit (L31183) → should have perfective (Q1424306), now has in instance of |
Example 2 | včelařit (L19745) → should have imperfective (Q371427), now has in instance of |
Example 3 | voskovat (L20144) → should have imperfective (Q371427) |
Motivation
editVerbs at least in czech are always of one of perfective or inperfective aspects, so they should be classified as such. Adrijaned (talk) 13:58, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Support David (talk) 15:48, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- Support Sure, I didn't realize there were so many applicable. Is this likely to be specific to senses of a lexeme, rather than the lexeme as a whole? ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:18, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- No idea honestly. In most, if not all slavic languages, a verb can be either perfective or imperfective, and that's it, across all the forms. There is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_aspect, but I am not enough of a linguist to make sense of all of that. Adrijaned (talk) 20:30, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment could we name this "grammatical aspect"? --- Jura 21:16, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
- Good call, done. Adrijaned (talk) 19:29, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Adrijaned, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, ArthurPSmith, Jura1: Done, see grammatical aspect (P7486) --DannyS712 (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2019 (UTC)