Wikidata:Property proposal/auxiliary verb
auxiliary verb
editOriginally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Lexemes
| Represents | auxiliary verb (Q465800) |
|---|---|
| Data type | Lexeme |
| Domain | verb (Q24905) |
| Allowed values | auxiliary verbs, e.g. de:sein; de:haben |
| Example 1 | gehen (de) → sein (Lexeme:L1761) |
| Example 2 | lesen (de) → haben (Lexeme:L4179) |
| Example 3 | aimer (fr) → avoir (Lexeme:L1886) |
| Example 4 | aller (fr) → être (Lexeme:L1882) |
Motivation
It is necessary to have this property for (German) verbs. --Betterknower (talk) 15:58, 22 June 2018 (UTC) Betterknower (talk) 15:58, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Discussion
Comment @Betterknower: Your examples need specific items they would be applied to - I assume the two you have listed (de:soll, de:haben) are the values for this property, not the items they would be applied to (generally). ArthurPSmith (talk) 16:54, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- @ArthurPSmith: You are right. These two words are the values. Is it better now? -Betterknower (talk) 18:48, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, looks good.
Support ArthurPSmith (talk) 20:19, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, looks good.
- @ArthurPSmith: You are right. These two words are the values. Is it better now? -Betterknower (talk) 18:48, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Question shouldn't the datatype be "Lexeme" (the values this property takes). The samples already mention lexemes. BTW, I added samples for French.
--- Jura 07:47, 24 June 2018 (UTC)- Support This is also needed for Danish (Q9035). — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 17:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Betterknower, ArthurPSmith, Fnielsen: please make good use of it.
--- Jura 16:32, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
