(Q24243652)

2

0 references

Michelle Proctor

4

0 references

author name string

Debbie Blake

1

0 references

Neil Johnson

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

3

0 references

publication date

17 October 2007

0 references

published in

0 references

cites work

Day 3 versus day 5 embryo transfer: a prospective randomized study.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Embryo transfer is equally effective at cleavage stage and blastocyst stage: a randomized prospective study.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Blastocyst culture and transfer: a step toward improved in vitro fertilization outcome.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in patients who failed to conceive in three or more day 2-3 embryo transfer cycles: a prospective, randomized study.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Day 3 embryo transfer with combined evaluation at the pronuclear and cleavage stages compares favourably with day 5 blastocyst transfer.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

A prospective randomized study: day 2 versus day 5 embryo transfer.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Is blastocyst transfer useful as an alternative treatment for patients with multiple in vitro fertilization failures?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Factors affecting the success of human blastocyst development and pregnancy following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

A prospective randomized multicenter study to evaluate the best day for embryo transfer: does the outcome justify prolonged embryo culture?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Comparison of blastocyst transfer with day 3 embryo transfer in similar patient populations

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Four indications for embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Blastocyst-ET and monozygotic twinning

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Uterine contractility decreases at the time of blastocyst transfers

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Changing the start temperature and cooling rate in a slow-freezing protocol increases human blastocyst viability

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Monozygotic twins and triplets in association with blastocyst transfer

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Blastocyst stage transfer: pitfalls and benefits. The benefits of extended culture

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Blastocyst embryo transfer is associated with a sex-ratio imbalance in favor of male offspring.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Incidence of chromosomal abnormalities from a morphologically normal cohort of embryos in poor-prognosis patients

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Successful autotransfer of tubal eggs in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta)

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Birth weight and sex ratio after transfer at the blastocyst stage in humans

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Elective single blastocyst transfer.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Risk of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer decreases over time: an 8-year experience

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Zona pellucida thickness variation and occurrence of visible mononucleated blastomers in preembryos are associated with a high pregnancy rate in IVF treatment

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Blastocyst versus day 2 or 3 transfer.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Assisted reproductive technologies and monozygous twins: implications for future study and clinical practice

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Prediction of embryo developmental potential and pregnancy based on early stage morphological characteristics.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

The cumulative embryo score: a predictive embryo scoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programme

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Common statistical errors in the design and analysis of subfertility trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Increasing levels of estradiol are deleterious to embryonic implantation because they directly affect the embryo

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Improved development of human embryos in vitro by a human oviductal cell co-culture system.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

Human gene expression first occurs between the four- and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

A simple nonsurgical technique to obtain unimplanted eggs from human uteri

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Prospective evaluation of blastocyst stage transfer vs. zygote intrafallopian tube transfer in patients with repeated implantation failure

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

A prospective randomized study comparing day 3 with blastocyst-stage embryo transfer

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Blastocyst transfer decreases multiple pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization cycles: a randomized controlled trial

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Pregnancies after in vitro fertilization and transfer of human blastocysts

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Environment of the preimplantation human embryo in vivo: metabolite analysis of oviduct and uterine fluids and metabolism of cumulus cells.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

A prospective, randomized study of embryo transfer results after 3 or 5 days of embryo culture in in vitro fertilization

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Development and integration of an extended embryo culture program

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Introduction of blastocyst culture and transfer for all patients in an in vitro fertilization program

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Implantation rates after in vitro fertilization and transfer of a maximum of two embryos that have undergone three to five days of culture

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

The number of eight-cell embryos is a key determinant for selecting day 3 or day 5 transfer

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Current status of in-vitro fertilisation and implantation of human embryos

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Precycle administration of GnRH antagonist and microdose HCG decreases clinical pregnancy rates without affecting embryo quality and blastulation

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Efficacy of blastocyst transfer after implantation failure

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

The predictive value of day 3 embryo morphology regarding blastocyst formation, pregnancy and implantation rate after day 5 transfer following in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Blastocyst stage transfer: pitfalls and benefits. Too soon to abandon current practice?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Chromosome mosaicism in day 3 aneuploid embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in vitro

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Day 5 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a controlled randomized trial

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

A prospective trial of blastocyst culture and transfer

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

A prospective, randomized study: day 3 versus hatching blastocyst stage

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Should we advise patients undergoing IVF to start a cycle leading to a day 3 or a day 5 transfer?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

The probability of pregnancy after embryo transfer is affected by the age of the patient, cause of infertility, number of embryos transferred and the average morphology score, as revealed by multiple logistic regression analysis

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Impairment of the hatching process following IVF in the human and improvement of implantation by assisting hatching using micromanipulation

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021

Improvement of human early embryo development in vitro by coculture on monolayers of Vero cells

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD002118.PUB3

7 January 2021