(Q24273213)

English

Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?

scientific article, 2012

In more languages

edit

Statements

instance of

scholarly article

0 references

title

Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence? (English)

0 references

1 reference

1 reference

1 reference

H. Pashler

1

0 references

E.-J. Wagenmakers

series ordinal

2

0 references

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

1 November 2012

0 references

published in

Perspectives on Psychological Science

0 references

volume

7

0 references

issue

6

0 references

page(s)

528-530

0 references

cites work

An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177/1745691612465253

retrieved

20 April 2017

Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177/1745691612465253

retrieved

20 April 2017

The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177/1745691612465253

retrieved

20 April 2017

The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1745691612465253

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1745691612465253

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011).

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1745691612465253

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1745691612465253

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1745691612465253

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Psychology research. Psychology's bold initiative.

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1745691612465253

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1745691612465253

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1745691612465253

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1745691612465253

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

The Nine Circles of Scientific Hell

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1745691612465253

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1745691612465253

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur?

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1745691612465253

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1745691612465253

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1745691612465253

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

Why most published research findings are false

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F1745691612465253

retrieved

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

inferred from DOI database lookup

(Q24273213)

Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?

Statements

Identifiers

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)