(Q24648998)

English

Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial

scientific article

In more languages

edit

Statements

instance of

scholarly article

0 references

title

Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial (English)

0 references

0 references

S van Rooyen

1

0 references

F Godlee

series ordinal

2

0 references

S Evans

series ordinal

3

0 references

N Black

series ordinal

4

0 references

R Smith

series ordinal

5

0 references

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

2 January 1999

0 references

published in

The BMJ

0 references

volume

318

0 references

issue

7175

0 references

page(s)

23-7

0 references

cites work

Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=27670

retrieved

7 April 2017

Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=27670

retrieved

28 September 2017

Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=27670

retrieved

28 September 2017

What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=27670

retrieved

28 September 2017

The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=27670

retrieved

28 September 2017

Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=27670

retrieved

28 November 2018

Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial

1 reference

stated in

PubMed

reference URL

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9872878

retrieved

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

Identifiers

DOI

10.1136/BMJ.318.7175.23

1 reference

stated in

Consolidated OpenCitations Corpus – April 2017

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

870468

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

870468

1 reference

stated in

Consolidated OpenCitations Corpus – April 2017

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

1 reference

Consolidated OpenCitations Corpus – April 2017

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

870468

PubMed publication ID

9872878

1 reference

stated in

Consolidated OpenCitations Corpus – April 2017

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

870468

ResearchGate publication ID

13415327

0 references

(Q24648998)

Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial

Statements

Identifiers

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)