(Q30882265)

27 June 2017

1 reference

title

Rescreening in cervical cytology for quality control. When bad data is worse than no data or what works, what doesn't, and why. (English)

1 reference

27 June 2017

0 references

1 reference

Andrew A Renshaw

1

1 reference

27 June 2017

publication date

1 September 2003

1 reference

Clinics in laboratory medicine

27 June 2017

published in

1 reference

27 June 2017

volume

23

1 reference

27 June 2017

issue

3

1 reference

27 June 2017

page(s)

695-708

1 reference

Measuring sensitivity in gynecologic cytology: a review

27 June 2017

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

High grade squamous cervical lesions following negative Papanicolaou smears: false-negative cervical cytology or rapid progression

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

On the "Irreducible false negative rate" in cervical cytology.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

Analysis of error in calculating the false-negative rate in the interpretation of cervicovaginal smears: the need to review abnormal cases

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

A practical problem with calculating the false-negative rate of Papanicolaou smear interpretation by rescreening negative cases alone

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

The human false-negative rate of rescreening Pap tests. Measured in a two-arm prospective clinical trial

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

An accurate and precise methodology for routine determination of the false-negative rate of Papanicolaou smear screening

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

Do proficiency test results correlate with the work performance of screeners who screen Papanicolaou smears?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

1 reference

7 January 2021

False negative rate of cervical cytologic smear screening as determined by rapid rescreening

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

Rapid Cervical Cytology Screening

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

Rapid rescreening of cervical smears: an improved method of quality control

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

Rapid screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control. For how long should we rescreen?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

Partial rescreening of all negative smears: an improved method of quality assurance in laboratories undertaking cervical screening

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

An assessment of partial rescreening as an internal quality control method for cervical smears

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

Interobserver variability of cervical smears with squamous-cell abnormalities: a Philadelphia study.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

Intralaboratory quality assurance in cervical/vaginal cytology: evaluation of intercytologist diagnostic reproducibility

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

Quality assurance in gynecologic cytology. The value of cytotechnologist-cytopathologist discrepancy logs

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the cytologic diagnosis of normal and abnormal metaplastic squamous cells in pap smears.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

Estimating the percentage of Papanicolaou smears that can be reproducibly identified: modeling Papanicolaou smear interpretation based on multiple blinded rescreenings

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

Proposed guidelines for primary screening instruments for gynecologic cytology. Developed by the Intersociety Working Group for Cytology Technologies

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

Bias in discrepant analysis: when two wrongs don't make a right.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: baseline results from a randomized trial

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: II. Prospective and archival sensitivity studies

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0272-2712%2803%2900054-4

7 January 2021

10.1016/S0272-2712(03)00054-4

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

27 June 2017

1 reference