(Q33843994)

29 July 2017

title

High-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate intracavitary therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a randomized trial (English)

1 reference

29 July 2017

Masato Hareyama

1

1 reference

29 July 2017

Koh-ichi Sakata

2

1 reference

29 July 2017

Atushi Oouchi

3

1 reference

29 July 2017

Hisayasu Nagakura

4

1 reference

29 July 2017

Mitsuo Shido

5

1 reference

29 July 2017

Masanori Someya

6

1 reference

29 July 2017

Kazumitsu Koito

7

1 reference

29 July 2017

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

1 January 2002

1 reference

29 July 2017

1 reference

29 July 2017

volume

94

1 reference

29 July 2017

issue

1

1 reference

29 July 2017

page(s)

117-124

1 reference

High-dose-rate remote afterloading intracavitary radiation therapy for cancer of the uterine cervix. A 20-year experience

29 July 2017

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

High-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

Literature analysis of high dose rate brachytherapy fractionation schedules in the treatment of cervical cancer: is there an optimal fractionation schedule?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

The influence of tumor size and morphology on the outcome of patients with FIGO stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

Radiotherapy for cervical cancer with high-dose rate brachytherapy correlation between tumor size, dose and failure.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

Effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

Figo IIIB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: an analysis of prognostic factors emphasizing the balance between external beam and intracavitary radiation therapy.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

High-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-IC) in treatment of cervical carcinoma: 5-year results and implication of increased low-grade rectal complication on initiation of an HDR-IC fractionation scheme

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

High-dose-rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: high tech or high risk?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

7 January 2021

High-dose-rate intracavitary irradiation in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix: Early experience with 84 patients

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

7 January 2021

The prediction of late rectal complications in patients treated with high dose-rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

7 January 2021

Carcinoma of the cervix: analysis of complications after primary external beam radiation and Ir-192 HDR brachytherapy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

7 January 2021

A comparison of the efficacy and complication rates of low dose-rate versus high dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of uterine cervical carcinoma

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

7 January 2021

Treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix by remotely controlled afterloading intracavitary radiotherapy with high-dose rate: a comparative study with a low-dose rate system

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

7 January 2021

High-dose rate and low-dose rate intracavitary therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Final results of Osaka University Hospital

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

7 January 2021

Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

7 January 2021

Low dose rate vs. high dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a clinical trial

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

7 January 2021

Comparison of high and low dose rate remote afterloading for cervix cancer and the importance of fractionation.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

7 January 2021

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement on cervical cancer. April 1-3, 1996

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

7 January 2021

Pretreatment and treatment factors associated with improved outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a final report of the 1973 and 1978 patterns of care studies

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

7 January 2021

Therapeutic results using high-dose-rate intracavitary irradiation in cases of cervical cancer

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

7 January 2021

Intracavitary irradiation of carcinoma of the cervix stage IB and IIA. A clinical comparison between a remote high dose-rate afterloading system and a low dose-rate manual system

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

7 January 2021

High-dose-rate afterloading technique in the radiation treatment of uterine cervical cancer: 399 cases and 9 years experience in Taiwan

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

7 January 2021

High-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer: analysis of tumor recurrence--the University of Wisconsin experience

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FCNCR.10207

7 January 2021

Identifiers

DOI

10.1002/CNCR.10207

1 reference

29 July 2017

1 reference