(Q34999183)

5 August 2017

title

Survival methods, including those using competing risk analysis, are not appropriate for intensive care unit outcome studies (English)

1 reference

5 August 2017

1 reference

1 reference

David Schoenfeld

1

1 reference

5 August 2017

publication date

1 February 2006

1 reference

5 August 2017

1 reference

5 August 2017

volume

10

1 reference

5 August 2017

issue

1

1 reference

5 August 2017

page(s)

103

1 reference

https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/cc3949

5 August 2017

exact match

0 references

cites work

Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome

1 reference

PubMed Central

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1550820

Evaluating mortality in intensive care units: contribution of competing risks analyses

8 July 2018

1 reference

PubMed Central

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1550820

Properties of proportional-hazards score tests under misspecified regression models

26 October 2018

1 reference

12 December 2020

Nonparametric estimation in a cure model with random cure times

1 reference

12 December 2020

Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of lisofylline for early treatment of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

1 reference

12 December 2020

Analysing survival in the presence of an auxiliary variable

1 reference

12 December 2020

Identifiers

DOI

10.1186/CC3949

1 reference

5 August 2017

1 reference

5 August 2017

1 reference