(Q35136170)

6 August 2017

title

Positive margins after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective study of 100 cases performed by 4 different surgeons (English)

1 reference

6 August 2017

Ahmed El-Feel

1

1 reference

6 August 2017

John W Davis

2

1 reference

6 August 2017

Serdar Deger

3

1 reference

6 August 2017

Jan Roigas

4

1 reference

6 August 2017

Andreas H Wille

5

1 reference

6 August 2017

Dietmar Schnorr

6

1 reference

6 August 2017

Amr Abdel Hakiem

7

1 reference

6 August 2017

Stefan Loening

8

1 reference

6 August 2017

Ingolf A Tuerk

9

1 reference

6 August 2017

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

1 June 2003

1 reference

6 August 2017

1 reference

6 August 2017

volume

43

1 reference

6 August 2017

issue

6

1 reference

6 August 2017

page(s)

622-626

1 reference

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience

6 August 2017

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0302-2838%2803%2900148-9

7 January 2021

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0302-2838%2803%2900148-9

7 January 2021

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0302-2838%2803%2900148-9

7 January 2021

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technical aspects and experience with 125 cases

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0302-2838%2803%2900148-9

7 January 2021

Surgical pathology examination of the prostate gland. Practice survey by American society of clinical pathologists

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0302-2838%2803%2900148-9

7 January 2021

Nerve grafts are rarely necessary and are unlikely to improve sexual function in men undergoing anatomic radical prostatectomy.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0302-2838%2803%2900148-9

7 January 2021

Incidence and significance of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0302-2838%2803%2900148-9

7 January 2021

Pathologic assessment of the surgical specimen

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0302-2838%2803%2900148-9

7 January 2021

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0302-2838%2803%2900148-9

7 January 2021

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the lessons learned

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0302-2838%2803%2900148-9

7 January 2021

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The Créteil experience.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0302-2838%2803%2900148-9

7 January 2021

Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1,000 cases.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0302-2838%2803%2900148-9

7 January 2021

Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0302-2838%2803%2900148-9

7 January 2021

Sural nerve graft during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Initial experience

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0302-2838%2803%2900148-9

7 January 2021

10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00148-9

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

6 August 2017

1 reference