(Q35194189)

English

Benefits of the paraspinal muscle-sparing approach versus the conventional midline approach for posterior nonfusion stabilization: comparative analysis of clinical and functional outcomes

scientific article

In more languages
default for all languages
No label defined

No description defined

Statements

Benefits of the paraspinal muscle-sparing approach versus the conventional midline approach for posterior nonfusion stabilization: comparative analysis of clinical and functional outcomes (English)

Identifiers

 
edit
    edit
      edit
        edit
          edit
            edit
              edit
                edit
                  edit