(Q35741556)

10 August 2017

title

Cost comparison of radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: single institution experience (English)

1 reference

10 August 2017

Ari D Silverstein

1

1 reference

10 August 2017

Alon Z Weizer

2

1 reference

10 August 2017

Jeannette M Dowell

3

1 reference

10 August 2017

Brian K Auge

4

1 reference

10 August 2017

David F Paulson

5

1 reference

10 August 2017

Philipp Dahm

6

1 reference

10 August 2017

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

1 April 2004

1 reference

10 August 2017

1 reference

10 August 2017

volume

63

1 reference

10 August 2017

issue

4

1 reference

10 August 2017

page(s)

746-750

1 reference

Cost containment in urology

10 August 2017

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2003.11.007

Impact of a clinical pathway for radical retropubic prostatectomy.

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2003.11.007

Influence of patient age and co-morbidity on outcome of a collaborative care pathway after radical prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2003.11.007

Ambulatory radical retropubic prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2003.11.007

Same day surgery for radical retropubic prostatectomy: is it an attainable goal?

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2003.11.007

Using outcome data and patient satisfaction surveys to develop policies regarding minimum length of hospitalization after radical prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2003.11.007

A comparison of the relative merits of radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2003.11.007

Radical prostatectomy: the pros and cons of the perineal versus retropubic approach

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2003.11.007

Outcome Study of Patient-Controlled Morphine Analgesia, With or Without Ketorolac, Following Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2003.11.007

Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2003.11.007

Relative advantages and disadvantages of radical perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2003.11.007

One-stage laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical perineal prostatectomy.

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2003.11.007

Epidemiology of radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer in the era of prostate-specific antigen: an overview of the Department of Defense Center for Prostate Disease Research national database

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2003.11.007

Radical retropubic prostatectomy outcomes at a community hospital

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2003.11.007

Surgical and postoperative factors affecting length of hospital stay after radical prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2003.11.007

A comparison of radical retropubic with perineal prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer within the Uniformed Services Urology Research Group

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2003.11.007

10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2003.11.007

7 January 2021

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

10 August 2017

1 reference