(Q36711655)

15 August 2017

1 reference

title

Differences between research ethics committees (English)

1 reference

15 August 2017

0 references

1 reference

ethics interoperability

1 reference

Sarah J L Edwards

1

1 reference

15 August 2017

Tracey Stone

series ordinal

2

1 reference

15 August 2017

Teresa Swift

series ordinal

3

1 reference

15 August 2017

publication date

1 January 2007

1 reference

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

15 August 2017

published in

1 reference

15 August 2017

volume

23

1 reference

15 August 2017

issue

1

1 reference

15 August 2017

page(s)

17-23

1 reference

Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study

15 August 2017

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

Evaluating the work of ethical review committees: an observation and a suggestion

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

Omalizumab in the treatment of allergic respiratory disease

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

Local research ethics committees. Differences in application process cause problems

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

Research ethics committees at work: the experience of one multi-location study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

Variation in Institutional Review processes for a multisite observational study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

Delays and diversity in the practice of local research ethics committees

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter clinical trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services research

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

Cross district comparison of applications to research ethics committees

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

Research ethics committees: differences and moral judgement

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

Research ethics committee audit: differences between committees

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

Ethics approval for a national postal survey: recent experience

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethics committee

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon genetic disorders

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

Responses by four Local Research Ethics Committees to submitted proposals

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

Inconsistency and institutional review boards

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

7 January 2021

The effects of local review on informed consent documents from a multicenter clinical trials consortium.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

7 January 2021

Local research ethics committees: hindrance or help?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

7 January 2021

Feasibility of a national fatal asthma registry: more evidence of IRB variation in evaluation of a standard protocol

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS0266462307051525

7 January 2021

10.1017/S0266462307051525

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

15 August 2017

1 reference