(Q36735081)

16 August 2017

1 reference

title

Prioritization of colorectal referrals: a review of the 2-week wait referral system. (English)

1 reference

16 August 2017

1 reference

Rai S

1

1 reference

16 August 2017

Kelly MJ

series ordinal

2

1 reference

16 August 2017

publication date

1 March 2007

1 reference

16 August 2017

1 reference

16 August 2017

volume

9

1 reference

16 August 2017

issue

3

1 reference

16 August 2017

page(s)

195-202

1 reference

Cancer survival in Britain is poorer than that of her comparable European neighbours

16 August 2017

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

The influence of a colorectal service on the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

Is the two week rule for cancer referrals working?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

Guidelines, compliance, and effectiveness: a 12 months' audit in an acute district general healthcare trust on the two week rule for suspected colorectal cancer

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

The fourteen-day rule and colorectal cancer

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

The Department of Health's "two week standard" for bowel cancer: is it working?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

Surgeon charged with manslaughter over kidney error

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

Two week rule for cancer referrals. Reducing waiting times from diagnosis to treatment might be more effective

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

The two week referral for colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

Untreatable faecal incontinence: colostomy or colostomy and proctectomy?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

Only fibres promoting a stable butyrate producing colonic ecosystem decrease the rate of aberrant crypt foci in rats

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

OncoSurge: a strategy for long-term survival in metastatic colorectal cancer

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis experience better bowel function and quality of life after ileorectal anastomosis than after ileoanal pouch.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery--lessons from a single UK centre series

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

Transanal full-thickness excision of rectal tumours: should the defect be sutured? a randomized controlled trial.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer--do they work?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

Influence of stage at diagnosis on survival differences for rectal cancer in three European populations

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

Prediction of colorectal cancer by a patient consultation questionnaire and scoring system: a prospective study.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

10.1111/J.1463-1318.2006.01107.X

21 January 2018

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

16 August 2017

1 reference