(Q37972177)

26 August 2017

Smaller prostate gland size and older age predict Gleason score upgrading (English)

1 reference

26 August 2017

Boris Gershman

1

1 reference

26 August 2017

Douglas M Dahl

2

1 reference

26 August 2017

Aria F Olumi

3

1 reference

26 August 2017

Robert H Young

4

1 reference

26 August 2017

W Scott McDougal

5

1 reference

26 August 2017

Chin-Lee Wu

6

1 reference

26 August 2017

28 December 2011

1 reference

26 August 2017

1 reference

26 August 2017

31

1 reference

26 August 2017

7

1 reference

26 August 2017

1033-1037

1 reference

Correlation of clinical stage, serum prostatic acid phosphatase and preoperative Gleason grade with final pathological stage in 275 patients with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate

26 August 2017

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Long-term prognostic significance of primary Gleason pattern in patients with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: impact on prostate cancer specific survival

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy. A multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Prostate needle biopsy reporting: how are the surgical members of the Society of Urologic Oncology using pathology reports to guide treatment of prostate cancer patients?

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Limitations of biopsy Gleason grade: implications for counseling patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancer

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Significant upgrading affects a third of men diagnosed with prostate cancer: predictive nomogram and internal validation

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Gleason grading of prostatic needle biopsies. Correlation with grade in 316 matched prostatectomies

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Evidence for a biopsy derived grade artifact among larger prostate glands

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

The influence of prostate size on cancer detection

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Prostate cancer volume at biopsy predicts clinically significant upgrading

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle biopsies or radical prostatectomy specimens: contemporary approach, current clinical significance and sources of pathology discrepancies

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Factors predicting prostatic biopsy Gleason sum under grading

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Small Transrectal Ultrasound Volume Predicts Clinically Significant Gleason Score Upgrading After Radical Prostatectomy: Results From the SEARCH Database

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

The association between prostate size and Gleason score upgrading depends on the number of biopsy cores obtained: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital Database

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Clinical predictors of Gleason score upgrading: implications for patients considering watchful waiting, active surveillance, or brachytherapy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Radical prostatectomy in men aged >or=70 years: effect of age on upgrading, upstaging, and the accuracy of a preoperative nomogram

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Incidence and variables predicting Gleason score up-grading between trans-rectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Men older than 70 years have higher risk prostate cancer and poorer survival in the early and late prostate specific antigen eras

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Prostate volume and pathologic prostate cancer outcomes after radical prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Hepatic resection: the last surgical frontier for colorectal cancer

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

A prostate gland volume of more than 75 cm3 predicts for a favorable outcome after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Association of prostate size and tumor grade in Korean men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

Does the size matter?: Prostate weight does not predict PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2011.11.032

10.1016/J.UROLONC.2011.11.032

7 January 2021

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

26 August 2017

1 reference