(Q38110720)

29 August 2017

Current status and future perspectives of prosthetic valve selection for aortic valve replacement (English)

1 reference

29 August 2017

0 references

Hiroshi Furukawa

1

1 reference

PubMed ID

23722587

29 August 2017

Kazuo Tanemoto

series ordinal

2

1 reference

PubMed ID

23722587

29 August 2017

language of work or name

1 reference

31 May 2013

1 reference

General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery

29 August 2017

1 reference

29 August 2017

62

1 reference

29 August 2017

1

1 reference

29 August 2017

19-23

1 reference

https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11748-013-0262-0

29 August 2017

0 references

cites work

Aortic valve surgery: marked increases in volume and significant decreases in mechanical valve use--an analysis of 41,227 patients over 5 years from the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland National database.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2010 : annual report by The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Coronary ostia obstruction after replacement of aortic valve prosthesis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after implantation of the Trifecta aortic bioprosthesis: an initial single-centre experience.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: durability results up to 21 years

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

CarboMedics Mitroflow pericardial aortic bioprosthesis - performance in patients aged 60 years and older after 15 years

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Clinical results of the Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis up to 13 years

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: assessment of 12-year performance

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Aortic valve replacement with 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic valves for a small calcified aortic annulus in elderly patients.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Aortic valve replacement with 17-mm St. Jude Medical prostheses for a small aortic root in elderly patients.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Performance at 10 years of the CarboMedics "Top-Hat" valve. Postclamping time is a predictor of mortality.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Mechanical aortic valve prostheses in the small aortic root: Top Hat versus standard CarboMedics aortic valve

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available bileaflet mechanical valves.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Differences in performance of five types of aortic valve prostheses: haemodynamic assessment by dobutamine stress echocardiography

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

What are the current results of sutureless valves in high-risk aortic valve disease patients?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Perceval S aortic valve implantation in mini-invasive surgery: the simple sutureless solution

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Sutureless perceval aortic valve replacement: results of two European centers

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Sutureless aortic valve replacement with the Trilogy Aortic Valve System: multicenter experience.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

First clinical experience and 1-year follow-up with the sutureless 3F-Enable aortic valve prosthesis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Clinical experience with the second-generation 3f Enable sutureless aortic valve prosthesis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Human minimally invasive off-pump valve-in-a-valve implantation.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation in degenerated bioprosthesis: the first valve in valve procedure using the Corevalve Revalving system.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights on prognostic factors and valve durability from the Canadian multicenter experience

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthetic heart valves.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Early and late outcomes of aortic valve replacement in dialysis patients

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Heart valve prosthesis selection in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Selection of artificial valve for the patients on hemodialysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Valve replacement in patients on chronic renal dialysis: implications for valve prosthesis selection

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Aortic valve prosthesis selection in dialysis patients based on the patient's condition.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Are bioprostheses associated with better outcome than mechanical valves in patients with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis who undergo valve surgery?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Association of comorbid conditions and mortality in hemodialysis patients in Europe, Japan, and the United States: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in dialysis patients.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Very long-term survival implications of heart valve replacement with tissue versus mechanical prostheses in adults <60 years of age.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Two-Year Outcomes after Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11748-013-0262-0

Long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of the Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis

21 January 2018

1 reference

12 December 2020

Effect of sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis on intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes

1 reference

12 December 2020

The incidence of transcatheter aortic valve implantation-related heart block in self-expandable Medtronic CoreValve and balloon-expandable Edwards valves

1 reference

12 December 2020

Angioplasty, stenting and thrombectomy to correct left main coronary stem obstruction by a bioprosthetic aortic valve.

1 reference

12 December 2020

An alternative option for elderly patients with a small aortic annulus: the 16 mm ATS valve.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Cardiac valve replacement in patients on dialysis: influence of prosthesis on survival

1 reference

12 December 2020

Absence of prosthesis-patient mismatch with the new generation of Edwards stented aortic bioprosthesis

1 reference

12 December 2020

The 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent valve is a valid option for patients with a small aortic annulus

1 reference

12 December 2020

Procedural and 30-day outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the third generation (18 Fr) corevalve revalving system: results from the multicentre, expanded evaluation registry 1-year following CE mark approval

1 reference

12 December 2020

Clinical outcome of aortic valve replacement with 16-mm ATS-advanced performance valve for small aortic annulus

1 reference

12 December 2020

Cardiac valvular surgery in dialysis patients: comparison of surgical outcome for mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves

1 reference

12 December 2020

10.1007/S11748-013-0262-0

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

29 August 2017

1 reference

PubMed ID

23722587