(Q38205033)

31 August 2017

0 references

Association and prediction of amniotic fluid measurements for adverse pregnancy outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis (English)

1 reference

31 August 2017

1 reference

1 reference

1 reference

1

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:24738894%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

14 June 2020

Richard D. Riley

5

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:24738894%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

14 June 2020

Khalid S Khan

8

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:24738894%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

14 June 2020

author name string

C H Meller

2

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:24738894%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

14 June 2020

J Tamblyn

3

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:24738894%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

14 June 2020

G M Malin

4

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:24738894%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

14 June 2020

M D Kilby

6

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:24738894%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

14 June 2020

S C Robson

7

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:24738894%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

14 June 2020

publication date

7 February 2014

1 reference

BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

31 August 2017

published in

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:24738894%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

14 June 2020

volume

121

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:24738894%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

14 June 2020

issue

6

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:24738894%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

14 June 2020

page(s)

686-699

1 reference

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:24738894%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

14 June 2020

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Systematic reviews to evaluate diagnostic tests

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Composite outcomes in randomized trials: greater precision but with greater uncertainty?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Prognosis and prognostic research: Developing a prognostic model

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

The influence of operator transducer pressure on ultrasonographic measurements of amniotic fluid volume.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Effect of fetal movement on the amniotic fluid index.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

The evidence for abandoning the amniotic fluid index in favor of the single deepest pocket

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: prognostic factor research

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Assessing the value of diagnostic tests: a framework for designing and evaluating trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

Prediction of small for gestational age newborns using ultrasound estimated and actual amniotic fluid volume: published data revisited

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589

The usefulness of ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid in predicting adverse outcome in prolonged pregnancy: a prospective blinded observational study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2F1471-0528.12589