(Q38491389)

3 September 2017

title

A case-control study of lung cancer screening in Okayama Prefecture, Japan (English)

1 reference

3 September 2017

1 reference

1 reference

Nishii K

1

1 reference

3 September 2017

Ueoka H

2

1 reference

3 September 2017

Kiura K

3

1 reference

3 September 2017

Kodani T

4

1 reference

3 September 2017

Tabata M

5

1 reference

3 September 2017

Shibayama T

6

1 reference

3 September 2017

Gemba K

7

1 reference

3 September 2017

Kitajima T

8

1 reference

3 September 2017

Hiraki A

9

1 reference

3 September 2017

Kawaraya M

10

1 reference

3 September 2017

Nakayama T

11

1 reference

3 September 2017

Harada M

12

1 reference

3 September 2017

publication date

1 December 2001

1 reference

3 September 2017

1 reference

3 September 2017

volume

34

1 reference

3 September 2017

issue

3

1 reference

3 September 2017

page(s)

325-332

1 reference

Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the Mayo Lung Project

3 September 2017

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

Lack of benefit from semi-annual screening for cancer of the lung: follow-up report of a randomized controlled trial on a population of high-risk males in Czechoslovakia.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

Lung cancer mortality in the Mayo Lung Project: impact of extended follow-up.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

Screening for lung cancer. Another look; a different view

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

UICC Workshop on the evaluation of screening programmes for cancer

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

Case-control studies for the evaluation of screening

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

Does screening by "Pap" smears help prevent cervical cancer? A case-control study

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

A case-control study of the efficacy of a non-randomized breast cancer screening program in Florence (Italy)

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

Evaluation of a mass screening program for stomach cancer with a case-control study design

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

A Case–Control Study of Screening Sigmoidoscopy and Mortality from Colorectal Cancer

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

Screening for lung cancer in the middle-aged

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

A case-control study for evaluating lung-cancer screening in Japan. Japanese Lung-Cancer-Screening Research Group

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

Evaluation of a clinic-based screening program for lung cancer with a case-control design in Kanagawa, Japan

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

Limitation of annual screening chest radiography for the diagnosis of lung cancer. A retrospective study

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

Sensitivity and specificity of lung cancer screening in Osaka, Japan.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

Case-control studies of cancer screening: theory and practice

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

Application of the case-control method in the evaluation of screening

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

Analysis of case-control studies of the efficacy of screening for cancer: How should we deal with tests done in persons with symptoms?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0169-5002%2801%2900270-7

7 January 2021

10.1016/S0169-5002(01)00270-7

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

3 September 2017

1 reference