(Q39167874)

9 September 2017

title

Comparing 14-day adhesive patch with 24-h Holter monitoring (English)

1 reference

9 September 2017

Christopher C Cheung

1

1 reference

9 September 2017

Charles R Kerr

series ordinal

2

1 reference

9 September 2017

Andrew D Krahn

series ordinal

3

1 reference

9 September 2017

publication date

1 May 2014

1 reference

9 September 2017

1 reference

9 September 2017

volume

10

1 reference

9 September 2017

issue

3

1 reference

9 September 2017

page(s)

319-322

1 reference

Diagnostic efficacy of 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring for syncope

9 September 2017

cites work

1 reference

Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring

21 January 2018

1 reference

A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope

21 January 2018

1 reference

Comparison of autotriggered memory loop recorders versus standard loop recorders versus 24-hour Holter monitors for arrhythmia detection.

21 January 2018

1 reference

A user-friendly integrated monitor-adhesive patch for long-term ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring

21 January 2018

1 reference

Use of a noninvasive continuous monitoring device in the management of atrial fibrillation: a pilot study

21 January 2018

1 reference

The diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias: a prospective multi-center randomized study comparing mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry versus standard loop event monitoring

21 January 2018

1 reference

Early detection of silent ischaemic heart disease by 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring of active subjects

21 January 2018

1 reference

21 January 2018

Identifiers

DOI

10.2217/FCA.14.24

1 reference

9 September 2017

1 reference