(Q42663311)

4 November 2017

0 references

Meta-analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis (English)

1 reference

4 November 2017

0 references

1 reference

Hiroshi Ohtani

1

1 reference

4 November 2017

Yutaka Tamamori

2

1 reference

4 November 2017

Yuichi Arimoto

3

1 reference

4 November 2017

Yukio Nishiguchi

4

1 reference

4 November 2017

Kiyoshi Maeda

5

1 reference

4 November 2017

Kosei Hirakawa

6

1 reference

4 November 2017

language of work or name

1 reference

14 August 2012

1 reference

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

4 November 2017

1 reference

4 November 2017

16

1 reference

4 November 2017

10

1 reference

4 November 2017

1929-1939

1 reference

https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11605-012-1972-9

4 November 2017

0 references

cites work

IV. The Incision Made in the Abdominal Wall in Cases of Appendicitis, with a Description of a New Method of Operating

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

21 January 2018

Endoscopic Appendectomy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Randomized, single-blinded trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: effects on postoperative analgesia

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Cost-effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Needlescopic, laparoscopic, and open appendectomy: a comparative study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

A prospective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Open and laparoscopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a comparison of primary outcome measures

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the obese patient: a subset analysis from a prospective, randomized, double-blind study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Ca-125: a useful marker to distinguish pulmonary tuberculosis from other pulmonary infections

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11605-012-1972-9

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in females with a clinical diagnosis of appendicitis.

21 January 2018

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial

1 reference

12 December 2020

A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analyses

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy

1 reference

12 December 2020

Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendicectomy

1 reference

12 December 2020

Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopic versus open surgical exploration in premenopausal women with suspected acute appendicitis.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Randomized controlled trial of appendicectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in men: a prospective randomized trial

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. A randomized clinical trial

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study

1 reference

12 December 2020

Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopic appendectomy does not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications

1 reference

12 December 2020

A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy

1 reference

12 December 2020

A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The Southern Surgeons Club

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: results of a prospective randomized study

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial

1 reference

12 December 2020

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement

1 reference

12 December 2020

A comparative study between laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in men.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laproscopic versus open appendectomy: a comparative study.

1 reference

12 December 2020

10.1007/S11605-012-1972-9

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

4 November 2017

1 reference