(Q43480340)

23 November 2017

0 references

Estimation of the predictive power of the model in mixed-effects meta-regression: A simulation study (English)

1 reference

23 November 2017

1 reference

5

1 reference

23 November 2017

author name string

José Antonio López-López

1

1 reference

23 November 2017

Fulgencio Marín-Martínez

2

1 reference

23 November 2017

Julio Sánchez-Meca

3

1 reference

23 November 2017

Wim Van den Noortgate

4

1 reference

23 November 2017

language of work or name

1 reference

8 January 2013

1 reference

British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology

23 November 2017

published in

1 reference

23 November 2017

volume

67

1 reference

23 November 2017

issue

1

1 reference

23 November 2017

page(s)

30-48

1 reference

maintained by WikiProject

23 November 2017

WikiProject Mathematics

0 references

cites work

An alternative to R(2) for assessing linear models of effect size

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FBMSP.12002

The relative benefits of meta-analysis conducted with individual participant data versus aggregated data

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FBMSP.12002

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FBMSP.12002

Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: a meta-analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FBMSP.12002

Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FBMSP.12002

Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FBMSP.12002

A note on variance estimation in random effects meta-regression.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FBMSP.12002

Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FBMSP.12002

How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FBMSP.12002

Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FBMSP.12002

Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FBMSP.12002

Bias and Efficiency of Meta-Analytic Variance Estimators in the Random-Effects Model

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FBMSP.12002

Accounting for Heterogeneity via Random-Effects Models and Moderator Analyses in Meta-Analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FBMSP.12002

Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FBMSP.12002

21 January 2018

Identifiers

DOI

10.1111/BMSP.12002

1 reference

23 November 2017

1 reference