(Q43516615)

24 November 2017

Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: 25 vs. 50 microg dose regimen (English)

1 reference

24 November 2017

1 reference

M T El-Sherbiny

1

1 reference

PubMed ID

11146073

24 November 2017

I H El-Gharieb

series ordinal

2

1 reference

PubMed ID

11146073

24 November 2017

H A Gewely

series ordinal

3

1 reference

24 November 2017

1 January 2001

1 reference

International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

24 November 2017

1 reference

24 November 2017

72

1 reference

24 November 2017

25-30

1 reference

24 November 2017

1

1 reference

A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction

24 November 2017

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0020-7292%2800%2900308-8

Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0020-7292%2800%2900308-8

A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0020-7292%2800%2900308-8

Oral or vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0020-7292%2800%2900308-8

A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0020-7292%2800%2900308-8

Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0020-7292%2800%2900308-8

Labor induction with misoprostol

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0020-7292%2800%2900308-8

Misoprostol is more efficacious for labor induction than prostaglandin E2, but is it associated with more risk?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0020-7292%2800%2900308-8

Intravaginal misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0020-7292%2800%2900308-8

Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): randomized comparison

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0020-7292%2800%2900308-8

A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0020-7292%2800%2900308-8

A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0020-7292%2800%2900308-8

Intracervical misoprostol as an effective method of labor induction at term

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0020-7292%2800%2900308-8

Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0020-7292%2800%2900308-8

10.1016/S0020-7292(00)00308-8

21 January 2018

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

24 November 2017

1 reference

PubMed ID

11146073