(Q43525431)

24 November 2017

title

Conversion from band to bypass in two steps reduces the risk for anastomotic strictures (English)

1 reference

24 November 2017

2

1 reference

24 November 2017

Yves Van Nieuwenhove

1

1 reference

24 November 2017

Katrien Van Renterghem

3

1 reference

24 November 2017

Dirk Van de Putte

4

1 reference

24 November 2017

Tom Henckens

5

1 reference

24 November 2017

Piet Pattyn

6

1 reference

24 November 2017

publication date

1 April 2011

1 reference

24 November 2017

1 reference

24 November 2017

volume

21

1 reference

24 November 2017

issue

4

1 reference

24 November 2017

page(s)

501-505

1 reference

A 10-year experience with laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: high long-term complication and failure rates.

24 November 2017

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Reoperations after gastric banding: replacement or alternative procedures?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Revision of failed gastric banding to mini-gastric bypass.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch or gastric bypass for failed gastric banding: retrospective study from two institutions with preliminary results.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Weight loss outcome of revisional bariatric operations varies according to the primary procedure

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Inadequate weight loss vs secondary weight regain: laparoscopic conversion from gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a re-do procedure for failed restricive gastric surgery

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Laparoscopic revision from LAP-BAND to gastric bypass.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Reoperative laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an experience with 49 cases

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Laparoscopic conversion of laparoscopic gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a review of 70 patients

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, but not rebanding, should be proposed as rescue procedure for patients with failed laparoscopic gastric banding

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after previous unsuccessful gastric restrictive surgery

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Laparoscopic reoperative bariatric surgery: experience from 27 consecutive patients

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Trends in mortality in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Impact of technological advances on complications of revisional bariatric operations

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Gastrojejunal anastomotic strictures following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: analysis of 1291 patients

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Incidence and outcome of anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic gastric bypass

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Risk of gastrojejunal anastomotic stricture with multifilament and monofilament sutures after hand-sewn laparoscopic gastric bypass: a prospective cohort study.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Gastric banding: conversion to sleeve, bypass, or DS.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11695-010-0331-8

Laparoscopic gastric re-banding versus laparoscopic gastric bypass as a rescue operation for patients with pouch dilatation

21 January 2018

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: complications and side effects responsible for the poor long-term outcome

1 reference

12 December 2020

Should bariatric revisional surgery be avoided secondary to increased morbidity and mortality?

1 reference

12 December 2020

Revision laparoscopic gastric bypass: an effective approach following failure of primary bariatric procedures

1 reference

12 December 2020

Sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure for failed gastric banding or gastroplasty

1 reference

12 December 2020

Revision of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a revision procedure after restrictive bariatric surgery

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopic revision of bariatric procedures: is it feasible?

1 reference

12 December 2020

Conversion of failed laparoscopic gastric banding to gastric bypass as safe and effective as primary gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients

1 reference

12 December 2020

One-year weight loss after primary or revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for failed adjustable gastric banding

1 reference

12 December 2020

10.1007/S11695-010-0331-8

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

Dimensions Publication ID

24 November 2017

1012384626

0 references

1 reference