(Q43939368)

English

Effectiveness of fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for elderly patients: a randomized trial

scientific article published in August 2012

In more languages

Statements

scholarly article

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

28 November 2017

Effectiveness of fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for elderly patients: a randomized trial (English)

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

28 November 2017

author name string

Q Wang

1

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

28 November 2017

J Suo

2

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

28 November 2017

J Jiang

3

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

28 November 2017

C Wang

4

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

28 November 2017

Y-Q Zhao

5

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

28 November 2017

X Cao

6

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

28 November 2017

publication date

1 August 2012

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

28 November 2017

Colorectal Disease

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

28 November 2017

14

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

28 November 2017

8

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

28 November 2017

1009-1013

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

28 November 2017

Management of patients in fast track surgery

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2011.02855.X

21 January 2018

Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2011.02855.X

21 January 2018

Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study).

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2011.02855.X

21 January 2018

Reduced length of stay and convalescence in laparoscopic vs open sigmoid resection with traditional care: a double blinded randomized clinical trial

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2011.02855.X

21 January 2018

Mechanical bowel preparation in intestinal surgery: a meta-analysis and review of the literature

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2011.02855.X

21 January 2018

Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open colonic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2011.02855.X

21 January 2018

Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer: results from a large nationwide population-based analysis

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2011.02855.X

21 January 2018

Effect of the laxative magnesium oxide on gastrointestinal functional recovery in fast-track colonic resection: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2011.02855.X

21 January 2018

Fast-track concepts in major open upper abdominal and thoracoabdominal surgery: a review

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJ.1463-1318.2011.02855.X

21 January 2018

Identifiers

10.1111/J.1463-1318.2011.02855.X

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

28 November 2017

PubMed publication ID

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

28 November 2017

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q43939368&oldid=2104526291"