(Q45213210)

English

The Bright- and Blind-Spots of Science: Why Objective Knowledge is not Enough to Resolve Environmental Controversies

scientific article published in September 2008

In more languages

edit

Statements

instance of

scholarly article

0 references

title

The Bright- and Blind-Spots of Science: Why Objective Knowledge is not Enough to Resolve Environmental Controversies (English)

0 references

author name string

Michael S. Carolan

series ordinal

1

0 references

language of work or name

1 reference

September 2008

0 references

published in

Critical Sociology

0 references

volume

34

0 references

issue

5

0 references

page(s)

725-740

0 references

cites work

Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0896920508093365

retrieved

21 January 2018

Carcinogenic risk assessment in the United States and Great Britain: the case of Aldrin/Dieldrin.

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0896920508093365

retrieved

21 January 2018

Taxonomic inflation: its influence on macroecology and conservation

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0896920508093365

retrieved

21 January 2018

The sweating system. 1892.

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0896920508093365

retrieved

21 January 2018

Challenging Global Warming as a Social Problem: An Analysis of the Conservative Movement's Counter-Claims

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0896920508093365

retrieved

21 January 2018

Defeating Kyoto: The Conservative Movement's Impact on U.S. Climate Change Policy

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0896920508093365

retrieved

21 January 2018

Science and public policy: what’s proof got to do with it?

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0896920508093365

retrieved

21 January 2018

Beyond the ivory tower. The scientific consensus on climate change

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0896920508093365

retrieved

21 January 2018

Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0896920508093365

retrieved

21 January 2018

How science makes environmental controversies worse

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0896920508093365

retrieved

21 January 2018

Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs.

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0896920508093365

retrieved

21 January 2018

The Construction of Global Warming and the Politics of Science

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0896920508093365

retrieved

21 January 2018

Democracy in the age of assessment: reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public-sector decision making

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177%2F0896920508093365

retrieved

21 January 2018

Identifiers

DOI

10.1177/0896920508093365

0 references

ResearchGate publication ID

258130678

0 references

(Q45213210)

The Bright- and Blind-Spots of Science: Why Objective Knowledge is not Enough to Resolve Environmental Controversies

Statements

Identifiers

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)