(Q45402188)

14 December 2017

title

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: what factors are related to the learning curve? (English)

1 reference

14 December 2017

Claudio Ricci

1

1 reference

14 December 2017

Riccardo Casadei

2

1 reference

14 December 2017

Salvatore Buscemi

3

1 reference

14 December 2017

Giovanni Taffurelli

4

1 reference

14 December 2017

Marielda D'Ambra

5

1 reference

14 December 2017

Carlo Alberto Pacilio

6

1 reference

14 December 2017

Francesco Minni

7

1 reference

14 December 2017

publication date

9 March 2014

1 reference

14 December 2017

1 reference

14 December 2017

volume

45

1 reference

14 December 2017

issue

1

1 reference

14 December 2017

page(s)

50-56

1 reference

Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies comparing open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: is it a safe procedure?

14 December 2017

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00595-014-0872-X

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00595-014-0872-X

Management of remnant pancreatic stump fto prevent the development of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy: current evidence and our strategy

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00595-014-0872-X

Learning curves for laparoscopic sigmoidectomy used to manage curable sigmoid colon cancer: single-institute, three-surgeon experience

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00595-014-0872-X

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: ascending the learning curve

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00595-014-0872-X

Learning curve for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a high-volume hospital.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00595-014-0872-X

Screen height as an ergonomic factor in laparoscopic surgery

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00595-014-0872-X

The usefulness of a grading system for complications resulting from pancreatic resections: a single center experience

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00595-014-0872-X

Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy in pancreatic tumours: a case-control study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00595-014-0872-X

The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00595-014-0872-X

Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00595-014-0872-X

Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00595-014-0872-X

Usefulness of the Clavien–Dindo classification after pancreaticoduodenectomy

21 January 2018

1 reference

PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24610347

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

Assessment of complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification after distal pancreatectomy.

1 reference

PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24610347

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

Identifiers

DOI

10.1007/S00595-014-0872-X

1 reference

14 December 2017

1 reference