(Q46160437)

English

What judges and lawyers think about the testimony of mental health experts: a survey of the courts and bar.

scientific article published in January 2001

In more languages

Statements

scholarly article

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

20 December 2017

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/11568962

What judges and lawyers think about the testimony of mental health experts: a survey of the courts and bar. (English)

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

20 December 2017

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/11568962

1 reference

based on heuristic

inferred from title

author name string

Redding RE

1

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

20 December 2017

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/11568962

Floyd MY

2

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

20 December 2017

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/11568962

Hawk GL

3

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

20 December 2017

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/11568962

publication date

1 January 2001

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

20 December 2017

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/11568962

Behavioral Sciences and the Law

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

20 December 2017

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/11568962

19

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

20 December 2017

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/11568962

4

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

20 December 2017

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/11568962

583-594

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

20 December 2017

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/11568962

Clinical versus actuarial judgment

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBSL.455

21 January 2018

The expert witness in psychology and psychiatry

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBSL.455

21 January 2018

The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judge evaluations of psychological science: are judges effective gatekeepers?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBSL.455

21 January 2018

Barring ultimate issue testimony: An "insane" rule?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2FBSL.455

21 January 2018

Identifiers

10.1002/BSL.455

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

20 December 2017

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/11568962

PubMed publication ID

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

20 December 2017

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/11568962

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q46160437&oldid=1260074792"