(Q46791641)

25 December 2017

meta-analysis

0 references

title

Propofol versus traditional sedative agents for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis (English)

1 reference

25 December 2017

gastrointestinal endoscopy

0 references

1 reference

1 reference

1 reference

2

1 reference

25 December 2017

author name string

Mohammed A Qadeer

1

1 reference

25 December 2017

Farah Khandwala

3

1 reference

25 December 2017

Rocio Lopez

4

1 reference

25 December 2017

Gregory Zuccaro

5

1 reference

25 December 2017

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

1 November 2005

1 reference

25 December 2017

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

published in

1 reference

25 December 2017

volume

3

1 reference

25 December 2017

issue

11

1 reference

25 December 2017

page(s)

1049-1056

1 reference

25 December 2017

Propofol: a gastroenterologist's perspective.

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Safety of propofol administered by registered nurses with gastroenterologist supervision in 2000 endoscopic cases

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Nurse-administered propofol sedation without anesthesia specialists in 9152 endoscopic cases in an ambulatory surgery center

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Patient-controlled versus nurse-administered sedation with propofol during colonoscopy. A prospective randomized trial

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Comparison of colonoscopies performed under sedation with propofol or with midazolam or without sedation

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Patient-controlled sedation with propofol for colonoscopy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Safer colonoscopy with patient-controlled analgesia and sedation with propofol and alfentanil

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Sedation for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: a Comparative Study of Propofol and Midazolam

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Propofol sedation for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison with midazolam

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Efficacy and safety of intravenous propofol sedation during routine ERCP: a prospective, controlled study.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Nurse-administered propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for upper endoscopy in cirrhotic patients

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Propofol versus midazolam for conscious sedation guided by processed EEG during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

A comparison of statistical methods for meta-analysis

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

A sensitivity analysis for publication bias in systematic reviews.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

The dawning of a new sedative: propofol in gastrointestinal endoscopy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

The science and politics of propofol

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Use of propofol for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopies.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Deep sedation occurs frequently during elective endoscopy with meperidine and midazolam

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

Evaluation of complications during and after conscious sedation for endoscopy using pulse oximetry.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1542-3565%2805%2900742-1

7 January 2021

10.1016/S1542-3565(05)00742-1

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

25 December 2017

1 reference

25 December 2017