(Q47314578)

13 January 2018

meta-analysis

0 references

title

A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques (English)

1 reference

13 January 2018

0 references

0 references

1 reference

L A Critchley

1

1 reference

13 January 2018

J A Critchley

series ordinal

2

1 reference

13 January 2018

publication date

1 February 1999

1 reference

13 January 2018

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

published in

1 reference

13 January 2018

volume

15

1 reference

13 January 2018

issue

2

1 reference

13 January 2018

page(s)

85-91

1 reference

13 January 2018

https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1023/a:1009982611386

exact match

0 references

cites work

Improving agreement between thoracic bioimpedance and dye dilution cardiac output estimation in children

1 reference

12 December 2020

Comparison of cardiac output measurement techniques: thermodilution, Doppler, CO2-rebreathing and the direct Fick method.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance: a study of reproducibility and comparison with thermodilution

1 reference

12 December 2020

Multicenter trial of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance device for cardiac output estimation

1 reference

12 December 2020

Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography and electrical bioimpedance

1 reference

12 December 2020

Method of assessing the reproducibility of blood flow measurement: factors influencing the performance of thermodilution cardiac output computers

1 reference

12 December 2020

Simultaneous intraoperative measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution and transtracheal Doppler.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Measurement of cardiac output by transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography in anaesthetized horses: comparison with thermodilution.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Relationship of bioimpedance to thermodilution and echocardiographic measurements of cardiac function

1 reference

12 December 2020

Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement

1 reference

12 December 2020

Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice

1 reference

12 December 2020

The validity of cardiac output measurement by thoracic impedance: a meta-analysis.

1 reference

12 December 2020

A comparison of the use of transoesophageal Doppler and thermodilution techniques for cardiac output determination.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Transoesophageal pulsed wave Doppler measurement of cardiac output during major vascular surgery: comparison with the thermodilution technique

1 reference

12 December 2020

Noninvasive cardiac output: simultaneous comparison of two different methods with thermodilution.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Cardiac output measurement in critical care patients: Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance versus thermodilution

1 reference

12 December 2020

Impedance cardiography. The impact of new technology.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Comparison of impedance cardiography with indirect Fick (CO2) method of measuring cardiac output in healthy children during exercise

1 reference

12 December 2020

Comparing methods of measurement: an alternative approach.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Simultaneous measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution, thoracic electrical bioimpedance and Doppler ultrasound.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Comparison of cardiac output estimation by thoracic electrical bioimpedance, thermodilution, and Fick methods

1 reference

12 December 2020

Lung fluid and impedance cardiography.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output in postaortocoronary bypass patients.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Comparison of thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution for the measurement of cardiac index in patients with severe sepsis.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Comparison of two impedance cardiographic techniques for measuring cardiac output in critically ill patients

1 reference

12 December 2020

Validation of thoracic electrical bioimpedance as a porcine research tool

1 reference

12 December 2020

Accuracy of the BoMED NCCOM3 bioimpedance cardiac output monitor during induced hypotension: an experimental study in dogs

1 reference

12 December 2020

Measurement of cardiac output-transtracheal Doppler versus thermodilution

1 reference

12 December 2020

Bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement: The bomed NCCOM3 after coronary bypass surgery

1 reference

12 December 2020

Cardiac output measurement: lack of agreement between thermodilution and thoracic electric bioimpedance in two clinical settings.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Impedance cardiography accurately measures cardiac output during exercise in children with cystic fibrosis.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Transtracheal Doppler cardiac output monitoring: comparison to thermodilution during noncardiac surgery.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Comparison of thermodilution, thoracic electrical bioimpedance and Doppler ultrasound cardiac output measurement

1 reference

12 December 2020

Identifiers

DOI

10.1023/A:1009982611386

1 reference

13 January 2018

Dimensions Publication ID

0 references

1 reference

13 January 2018