(Q48315283)

10 February 2018

title

Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study. (English)

1 reference

10 February 2018

inferred from citation network

main subject

data ethics

1 reference

based on heuristic

1 reference

David Kaufman

1

1 reference

10 February 2018

Juli Murphy

series ordinal

2

1 reference

10 February 2018

Joan Scott

series ordinal

3

1 reference

10 February 2018

Kathy Hudson

series ordinal

4

1 reference

10 February 2018

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

1 November 2008

1 reference

10 February 2018

published in

Genetics in Medicine

1 reference

10 February 2018

volume

10

1 reference

10 February 2018

issue

11

1 reference

10 February 2018

page(s)

831-839

1 reference

10 February 2018

https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1097/gim.0b013e31818bb3ab

exact match

0 references

cites work

UK Biobank gets 10% response rate as it starts recruiting volunteers

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Development of a large-scale de-identified DNA biobank to enable personalized medicine.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

21 January 2018

UK Biobank: bank on it.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Consent for genetic research in a general population: an update on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey experience

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

An Icelandic saga on a centralized healthcare database and democratic decision making.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Genetic and environmental contributions to cardiovascular disease risk in American Indians: the strong heart family study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Consent for genetic research in a general population: the NHANES experience

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Genes, environment and the value of prospective cohort studies

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Community engagement in genetic research: results of the first public consultation for the Quebec CARTaGENE project

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Attitudes and perceptions of patients towards methods of establishing a DNA biobank

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Great expectations: views of genetic research participants regarding current and future genetic studies

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Public attitudes regarding the donation and storage of blood specimens for genetic research

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Willingness to donate blood samples for genetic research: a survey from a community in Singapore

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Attitudes of urban American Indians and Alaska Natives regarding participation in research

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Intentions to participate in genetics research among African American smokers

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

High rate of consent to bank biologic samples for future research: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

The debate over research on stored biological samples: what do sources think?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

A genetic and epidemiologic study of cardiovascular disease in Alaska natives (GOCADAN): design and methods

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

The return of research results to participants: pilot questionnaire of adolescents and parents of children with cancer

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Informed consent and biobanks.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Attitudes of research ethics board chairs towards disclosure of research results to participants: results of a national survey

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

A study of public opinion on the use of tissue samples from living subjects for clinical research

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Views of female breast cancer patients who donated biologic samples regarding storage and use of samples for genetic research.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Informed consent and subject motivation to participate in a large, population-based genomics study: the Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Fair payment or undue inducement?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

A piece of my mind. Subject to payment?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Improving informed consent and enhancing recruitment for research by understanding economic behavior

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

An assessment of willingness to participate in a randomized trial of arthroscopic knee surgery in patients with osteoarthritis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Prospective preference assessment: a method to enhance the ethics and efficiency of randomized controlled trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Empirical assessment of whether moderate payments are undue or unjust inducements for participation in clinical trials.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Hypertensive patients' willingness to participate in placebo-controlled trials: implications for recruitment efficiency

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

The Third Generation Cohort of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study: Design, Recruitment, and Initial Examination

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

Implications of Disclosing Individual Results of Clinical Research

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1097%2FGIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

10.1097/GIM.0B013E31818BB3AB

21 January 2018

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

10 February 2018

Dimensions Publication ID

1010948009

0 references

1 reference

10 February 2018