(Q50646012)

17 March 2018

title

Response to Keriel-Gascou et al.: higher efficiency and other alleged advantages are not inherent to the stepped wedge design. (English)

1 reference

17 March 2018

author

Wolfgang Viechtbauer

1

1 reference

17 March 2018

Ilja C. W. Arts

4

1 reference

17 March 2018

author name string

Daniel Kotz

2

1 reference

17 March 2018

Mark Spigt

3

1 reference

17 March 2018

Rik Crutzen

5

1 reference

17 March 2018

publication date

29 April 2014

1 reference

17 March 2018

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

published in

1 reference

17 March 2018

volume

67

1 reference

17 March 2018

issue

7

1 reference

17 March 2018

page(s)

834-836

1 reference

17 March 2018

Use of the stepped wedge design cannot be recommended: A critical appraisal and comparison with the classic cluster randomized controlled trial design

cites work

2 references

23 June 2024

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2014.02.015

23 June 2024

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/citations/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2012.06.004

A stepped wedge cluster randomized trial is preferable for assessing complex health interventions

1 reference

23 June 2024

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2014.02.015

Systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials shows that design is particularly used to evaluate interventions during routine implementation

1 reference

23 June 2024

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2014.02.015

The stepped wedge design does not inherently have more power than a cluster randomized controlled trial

2 references

23 June 2024

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2014.02.015

23 June 2024

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/citations/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2013.05.004

The stepped wedge cluster randomized trial always requires fewer clusters but not always fewer measurements, that is, participants than a parallel cluster randomized trial in a cross-sectional design. In reply.

1 reference

23 June 2024

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2014.02.015

Researchers should convince policy makers to perform a classic cluster randomized controlled trial instead of a stepped wedge design when an intervention is rolled out

2 references

23 June 2024

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2014.02.015

23 June 2024

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/citations/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2012.06.016

The efficiency of stepped wedge vs. cluster randomized trials: stepped wedge studies do not always require a smaller sample size

1 reference

23 June 2024

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2014.02.015

Stepped wedge cluster randomized trials are efficient and provide a method of evaluation without which some interventions would not be evaluated

1 reference

23 June 2024

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2014.02.015

Parable of Two Agencies, One of Which Randomizes

1 reference

23 June 2024

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2014.02.015

The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review.

1 reference

23 June 2024

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2014.02.015

Stepped wedge designs could reduce the required sample size in cluster randomized trials

1 reference

23 June 2024

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2014.02.015

Identifiers

DOI

10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2014.02.015

1 reference

17 March 2018

1 reference

17 March 2018