(Q51596507)

English

Why QSAR fails: an empirical evaluation using conventional computational approach.

scientific article published on 16 March 2011

In more languages

edit

Statements

instance of

scholarly article

1 reference

stated in

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

21370915

retrieved

7 April 2018

reference URL

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21370915

title

Why QSAR fails: an empirical evaluation using conventional computational approach. (English)

1 reference

stated in

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

21370915

retrieved

7 April 2018

reference URL

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21370915

author name string

Jianping Huang

series ordinal

1

1 reference

stated in

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

21370915

retrieved

7 April 2018

reference URL

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21370915

Xiaohui Fan

series ordinal

2

1 reference

stated in

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

21370915

retrieved

7 April 2018

reference URL

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21370915

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

16 March 2011

1 reference

stated in

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

21370915

retrieved

7 April 2018

reference URL

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21370915

published in

Molecular Pharmaceutics

1 reference

stated in

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

21370915

retrieved

7 April 2018

reference URL

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21370915

volume

8

1 reference

stated in

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

21370915

retrieved

7 April 2018

reference URL

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21370915

issue

2

1 reference

stated in

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

21370915

retrieved

7 April 2018

reference URL

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21370915

page(s)

600-608

1 reference

stated in

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

21370915

retrieved

7 April 2018

reference URL

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21370915

cites work

How to recognize and workaround pitfalls in QSAR studies: a critical review

1 reference

stated in

COCI

reference URL

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/citations/10.2174/092986709789578213

retrieved

18 May 2024

Identifiers

DOI

10.1021/MP100423U

1 reference

stated in

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

21370915

retrieved

7 April 2018

reference URL

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21370915

Fatcat ID

release_baduympd4rg3hmx3qcwock5tpq

1 reference

stated in

Fatcat

reference URL

https://api.fatcat.wiki/v0/release/baduympd4rg3hmx3qcwock5tpq

retrieved

24 November 2022

based on heuristic

mapped directly with Wikidata item

PubMed publication ID

21370915

1 reference

stated in

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

21370915

retrieved

7 April 2018

reference URL

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21370915

(Q51596507)

Why QSAR fails: an empirical evaluation using conventional computational approach.

Statements

Identifiers

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)