(Q52928101)

9 May 2018

title

Reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostate cancer can be improved by the use of reference images. (English)

1 reference

9 May 2018

1 reference

1 reference

1

1 reference

9 May 2018

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

1 February 2001

1 reference

9 May 2018

published in

Urology

1 reference

9 May 2018

volume

57

1 reference

9 May 2018

issue

2

1 reference

9 May 2018

page(s)

291-295

1 reference

9 May 2018

Prostatic adenocarcinoma: reproducibility and correlation with clinical stages of four grading systems.

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2800%2900922-5

7 January 2021

Histological grading of prostatic carcinoma in prostatectomy specimens. Comparison of prognostic accuracy of five grading systems

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2800%2900922-5

7 January 2021

Histologic grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: intraobserver reproducibility of the Mostofi, Gleason and Böcking grading systems.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2800%2900922-5

7 January 2021

Observer variability in the histopathological reporting of needle biopsy specimens of the prostate

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2800%2900922-5

7 January 2021

Interobserver variation in prostate cancer Gleason scoring: are there implications for the design of clinical trials and treatment strategies?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2800%2900922-5

7 January 2021

Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2800%2900922-5

7 January 2021

Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy. A multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2800%2900922-5

7 January 2021

Accuracy of biopsy Gleason scores from a large uropathology laboratory: use of a diagnostic protocol to minimize observer variability

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2800%2900922-5

7 January 2021

Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: accuracy and clinical implications

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2800%2900922-5

7 January 2021

Correlation of prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason grade in academic and community settings

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2800%2900922-5

7 January 2021

Heterogeneity of prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2800%2900922-5

7 January 2021

Histological grade heterogeneity in multifocal prostate cancer. Biological and clinical implications

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2800%2900922-5

7 January 2021

Histologic grading of prostate cancer: a perspective

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2800%2900922-5

7 January 2021

Pathology residents' use of a Web-based tutorial to improve Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma on needle biopsies

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2800%2900922-5

7 January 2021

Correlation between visual clues, objective architectural features, and interobserver agreement in prostate cancer

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2800%2900922-5

7 January 2021

10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00922-5

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

9 May 2018

1 reference

9 May 2018