(Q53954891)

22 May 2018

meta-analysis

0 references

title

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. (English)

1 reference

22 May 2018

1 reference

Golub R

1

1 reference

22 May 2018

Siddiqui F

series ordinal

2

1 reference

22 May 2018

Pohl D

series ordinal

3

1 reference

22 May 2018

publication date

1 May 1998

1 reference

22 May 2018

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

published in

1 reference

22 May 2018

volume

186

1 reference

22 May 2018

issue

5

1 reference

22 May 2018

page(s)

545-553

1 reference

22 May 2018

cites work

Endoscopic Appendectomy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: a prospective assessment.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Laparoscopic versus traditional appendectomy for suspected appendicitis

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Laparoscopic appendectomy. A safety and cost analysis

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: a prospective evaluation

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Is laparoscopic appendectomy the new 'gold standard'?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Laparoscopic appendectomy-is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young women

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendicectomy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. A randomized clinical trial

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: results of a prospective randomized study

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Clinical studies in surgical journals--have we improved?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

The statistical basis of meta-analysis

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Estimators of the Mantel-Haenszel variance consistent in both sparse data and large-strata limiting models

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Meta-analysis: an introduction and point of view

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Meta-analysis in clinical research

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Meta-analysis in clinical trials reporting: has a tool become a weapon?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Early discharge from hospital after open appendicectomy.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a Tower of Babel bias?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Diagnostic laparoscopy: reducing the number of normal appendectomies

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Randomized study of the value of laparoscopy before appendicectomy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Goodbye to late bowel obstruction after appendicectomy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

A "Bikini" incision for appendectomy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Does pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy increase bacterial translocation?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Peritoneal host defenses are less impaired by laparoscopy than by open operation

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

Does laparoscopy increase bacteremia and endotoxemia in a peritonitis model?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS1072-7515%2898%2900080-5

7 January 2021

10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00080-5

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

22 May 2018

PubMed ID

9583695

1 reference

22 May 2018