(Q89216372)

English

Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning

scientific article published on 20 June 2018

In more languages

edit

Statements

instance of

scholarly article

1 reference

stated in

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

29935897

reference URL

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:29935897%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

retrieved

1 April 2020

title

Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning (English)

1 reference

stated in

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

29935897

reference URL

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:29935897%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

retrieved

1 April 2020

main subject

fake news

0 references

political polarization

0 references

author

David G. Rand

series ordinal

2

1 reference

stated in

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

29935897

reference URL

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:29935897%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

retrieved

1 April 2020

Gordon Pennycook

0 references

publication date

20 June 2018

1 reference

stated in

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

29935897

reference URL

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:29935897%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

1 April 2020

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

29935897

reference URL

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:29935897%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

retrieved

1 April 2020

volume

188

1 reference

stated in

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

29935897

reference URL

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:29935897%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

retrieved

1 April 2020

page(s)

39-50

1 reference

stated in

Europe PubMed Central

PubMed publication ID

29935897

reference URL

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=EXT_ID:29935897%20AND%20SRC:MED&resulttype=core&format=json

retrieved

1 April 2020

cites work

Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks

2 references

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/citations/10.1038/NCLIMATE1547

Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Divine intuition: cognitive style influences belief in God.

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

The evolution and devolution of cognitive control: The costs of deliberation in a competitive world.

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Cyclical population dynamics of automatic versus controlled processing: An evolutionary pendulum.

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Has the Standard Cognitive Reflection Test Become a Victim of Its Own Success?

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook

2 references

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/citations/10.1126/SCIENCE.AAA1160

Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

The spread of true and false news online.

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking

2 references

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/citations/10.1111/JOPY.12476

Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making.

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Searching for explanations: How the Internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Override the controversy: Analytic thinking predicts endorsement of evolution

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Brain Drain: The Mere Presence of One’s Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics

2 references

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/citations/10.1073/PNAS.1704882114

The Generalizability of Survey Experiments

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Bias and Conflict: A Case for Logical Intuitions.

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

The science of fake news

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Motivated reasoning and public opinion

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Reminders and Repetition of Misinformation: Helping or Hindering Its Retraction?

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Atheists and Agnostics Are More Reflective than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-Analysis

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Evolutionary game dynamics of controlled and automatic decision-making.

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Cultural cognition of scientific consensus

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief.

2 references

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/citations/10.1016/J.TICS.2018.01.004

The Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever “Get It”?

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Climate-Science Communication and theMeasurement Problem

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement.

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?

1 reference

26 December 2023

https://opencitations.net/index/api/v1/references/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.06.011

(Q89216372)

Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning

Statements

Identifiers

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)