Talk:Q18195572
Latest comment: 9 years ago by LuisV (WMF) in topic official website v. reference URL?
Autodescription — Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Netherlands (Q18195572)
description: Creative Commons license
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Netherlands” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
official website v. reference URL?
editWhy official website (which I'd think of as creativecommons.org) instead of reference URL? Not a strong preference, just wondering what the thinking/evaluation process for that was. —LuisV (WMF) (talk) 21:52, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Luis, reference URL should be used as reference, not as statement. Multichill (talk) 15:49, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- Ah, a reference justifying the statement, you mean? That makes sense, but isn't clear from the description of P854. LuisV (WMF) (talk) 01:06, 16 October 2014 (UTC)