Talk:Q185602

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Amadalvarez in topic About reversion
description: national park of Norway
Useful links:
Generic queries for administrative territorial entities

This list of queries is designed for all instances of administrative territorial entity (Q56061). It is generated using {{TP administrative area}}.

🌎 Geography 🌎

👥 People 👥

🎭 Arts and fictions 🎭


See also

WikiProject Norway

About reversion

edit

@fralambert: Regarding your reversion. It's not clear the criteria about how to use the diferent "included in a list" properties in articles of "natural heritage (Q386426)". For instance, in Yosemite National Park (Q180402): while the heritage designation (P1435) includes World Heritage Site (Q9259) (a natural heritage category), the IUCN category II: National Park (Q14545628) appears as a data for IUCN protected areas category (P814). In the cultural heritage (Q210272) articles all the "list protection" items are under a unique property (heritage designation (P1435)) and the different ID's of each one are in a specific property. So, in my opinion, the structure to gather all the classification systems that recognize the item, is follow the data structure that already it's running very well for cultural heritage (Q210272) items, as the heritage designation (P1435) is a valid property either for cultural heritage (Q210272) and natural heritage (Q386426). Awaiting your reply, thanks.--Amadalvarez (talk) 06:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

For the categories under IUCN protected areas category (P814), it's not a status, but only a classification between a protected area of a country and a another. Contrary of a natural heritage status, like site naturel classé (Q3485446) in France, it could change without notice. Like i just changed the IUCN protected areas category (P814) on White Goat Wilderness Area (Q2828324), even if the province of Alberta don't change the law or by-law about this wilderness area. Also, I not sure the redundancy of a data between heritage designation (P1435) and IUCN protected areas category (P814) is a good idea. Note if you have futher question, I think the best wil be to continue the discussion on Wikidata talk:WikiProject Protected areas. --Fralambert (talk) 16:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

I move this discussion to Wikidata talk:WikiProject Protected areas as User:Fralambert suggested. END of this discussion here. --Amadalvarez (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Return to "Q185602" page.