Archives en discussions structurées: User talk:Fralambert/Structured Discussions Archive 1.

Wikidata weekly summary #640

edit

Wikidata weekly summary #641

edit

Wikidata weekly summary #641

edit

Undeletion if item Q129091821

edit

Hello @Fralambert

i hope this request meets you well, you deleted the item with the tag of "doesn't meet notability". an item can't fulfil all the criteria of notability but once an item fulfil one of the criteria, it can be keep. i guess the reference i added wasn't enough, i added few reference url below. I will appreciate it if you can check them and undelete the item.


Thank You.

https://www.itsnicethat.com/news/glasgow-print-fair-marcus-oakley-risotto-illustration-260620

https://theweek.com/articles/476352/coming-soon-augmented-reality-glasses-pro-athletes

https://www.akhbar.com/51142432/entrepreneur-oakley-chan-leads-ochk-groups-strategic-expansion-into-the-uae-market?#/

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/oakley-chans-ochk-group-embarks-121000881.html

https://www.rollingstone.com/product-recommendations/lifestyle/damian-lillard-oakley-sunglasses-price-1137566/

https://rollingstoneindia.com/bob-marleys-family-taps-british-jamaican-singer-celeste-on-remake-of-one-love/amp/ Dunjhoye (talk) 16:14, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

The first one is not about your person, the last one is a add about some glasses and the three other are press release. Nothing that I would consider notable. And please don't send me everything with "oakley" on the name. Fralambert (talk) 00:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Delete Q7238821?

edit

I had previously merged Pratylenchus vulnus (Q7238821), but I would have preferred to see it deleted. You deleted Q6813517 and Q6813518 corresponding to en.wiki articles that I have proposed for deletion, but which have not yet been deleted. The situation underlying all of these is the same; bogus species articles created following vandalism on en.wiki.

I am happy that you deleted items Q6813517 and Q6813518 that were based on en.wiki vandalism. Would you consider deleting Pratylenchus vulnus (Q7238821) as well? Plantdrew (talk) 03:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Plantdrew Sorry, but you made me realising that I deleted these items to early. I just undeleted them and start a new RfD. As for Pratylenchus dulscus, we could ask a RfD, but you have to unmerge it first. Fralambert (talk) 11:24, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply