Talk:Q212071
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Paracel63 in topic Incorrect instance?
Autodescription — rector (Q212071)
description: academic official
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “rector” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- rector (Q212071)
- director (Q1162163)
- leader of organization (Q25713832) (@)→
- chief manager (Q20920693)
- manager (Q2462658)
- →(@) leader of organization (Q25713832)
- manager (Q2462658)
- position (Q4164871)
- director (Q1162163)
- rector (Q212071)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
rector⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- Generic queries for position
This section is generated using {{Generic queries for positions}}
- List of people holding the position, sorted by starting date (query)
- List of people and their ID's on other systems (query)
- Number of people having hold this position by gender (query) – List of people having hold this position with gender (query)
- Number of people having hold the position by country of citizenship (query) – List of people having hold the position by country of citizenship (query)
- People having hold the function by length of term (query)
- List of people having hold the position by total duration in the position (query)
- List of people having hold the position by gender at the starting date (query)
- List of people holding the function with employer as qualifier (query)
- List of people having hold the position as qualifier of employer (P108) (query)
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Incorrect instance? edit
@Infovarius: Hi! You undid my attempt at resolving the problem with "Q212071" notified below "Occupation" in this item. As you seem to know what's right and what's not, maybe you can fix the issue instead? The notification text for the statement reads (in English): "Values of occupation statements should be instances of one of the following classes (or of one of their subclasses), but rector currently isn't: occupation / profession / fictional profession". And, in the future, it would be much more helpful, when undoing the work of others, to add a more elaborate edit comment than no. All the best. 
--Paracel63 (talk) 12:21, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Paracel63:
Done and sorry for short comment. It's hard for novices to make the right choice, I understand. But it's also hard for me to overview all edits in my watchlist in reasonable time... --Infovarius (talk) 00:13, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Infovarius:
Like Thanks! No problem, as I see that you are as active on WD that I am at svwp. And I see here that there was a rather complex issue of getting the occupations/position statements right. Allt the best. 
--Paracel63 (talk) 12:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Infovarius:
