Talk:Q26998376
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Wostr in topic Duplicate
Autodescription — (32RS)-rapamycin (Q26998376)
description: group of stereoisomers
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “(32RS)-rapamycin” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- (32RS)-rapamycin (Q26998376)
- (RS)-rapamycin (Q27163227)
- macrolides (Q422687)
- N,N-disubstituted primary carboxamide (Q72400550)
- piperidine (Q59348943)
- tetrahydropyran (Q64746723)
- triol (Q3539455)
- methyl ether (Q67206812)
- →(⁋) carboxylate ester (Q355518)
- (RS)-rapamycin (Q27163227)
- (32RS)-rapamycin (Q26998376)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
(32RS)-rapamycin
⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}
.
Duplicate
editAppears to be a replicate of https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q32089 – The preceding unsigned comment was added by K krysiak (talk • contribs) at 10 July 2017 (UTC).
- @K krysiak: suspicious request? Related items: (32RS)-rapamycin (Q26998376): group of stereoisomers and sirolimus (Q32089): pharmaceutical drug--Estopedist1 (talk) 06:48, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Not done It's not a duplicate. sirolimus (Q32089) describe a chemical compound with all stereogenic centres defined. (32RS)-rapamycin (Q26998376) describe a group of stereoisomers (in other words: compound with one undefined stereogenic centre). Just like (RS)-rapamycin (Q27163227) describe group of stereoisomers (i.e. compound with all undefined stereogenic centres). This is a common approach in many chemical databases that there are entries about compounds with undefined stereochemistry, i.e. group of stereoisomers (don't confuse it with: mixture of stereoisomers or racemic mixture). Wostr (talk) 12:15, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Wostr (talk) 12:15, 4 November 2020 (UTC) |