8/26 UnblockEdit

 
Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.

2600:387:5:805:0:0:0:17
block logipblocklistcrossblockluxo'sunblockremove gblock • contribs: +/-

Request reason:
After 2 months of being blocked, and not even being able to edit with an account, I at least ask the “anon only” mode on. There is extreme collateral. In fact, we should be unblocked-the user is very disruptive, bit innocent people can’t edit with IPBE. Please check the range. 2600:387:5:805:0:0:0:17 15:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have been caught using sockpuppets in the past and subsequently this IP range has been blocked due to a related block evasion. We are not going to allow logged-in edits from this range. Per Special:Diff/1217483087, there is at best very little collateral damage due to this block. —MisterSynergy (talk) 22:36, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


'

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | français | Nederlands | português | русский | +/−


This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.