About this board

Welcome !

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Dachary/Archive 1 on 2016-07-16.

Genium (talkcontribs)

Bonjour Loïc,

J'ai créé la page Wolfgang Sourdeau (Q117048737) relative au logiciel GNU HaliFAX (Q117048683). J'aimerais bien l'illustrer d'une photo et alimenter par la même occasion la catégorie GNU people sur Wikimedia Commons. J'en ai trouvé une sur le site archivé FSF France mais je ne sais pas si le fichier est sous licence CC-BY. Si oui, serait-il possible de l'indiquer quelque part, sur le site de l'April ou ailleurs, avec le nom de l'auteur ?

Cordialement,

Genium. 18:39, Mar 10, 2023 (UTC+01:00)

Dachary (talkcontribs)

Bonjour Wolfgang,

J'avoue ne pas avoir la moindre idée de qui a pris cette photo. Il est bien possible que ce soit moi: je me souviens avoir eu cette activité de façon assez intensive à cette époque. Si c'est le cas alors la photo est sous license libre, bien sur.

Désolé pour cette incertitude qui surgit 20 ans plus tard.

Cordialement


~~~~

Reply to "Wolfgang Sourdeau (Q117048737)"
GZWDer (talkcontribs)

Your bot has been listed at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Removal/Inactive bot accounts 2 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure it's proposed to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can rerequest the bot flag at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot should you need it again. Of course, You may request retaining your bot flag here if you need the bot flag. Regards

Dachary (talkcontribs)

I agree to the removal of the bot flag.

Reply to "FLOSSbot"

wbEntity config value to be dropped on July 24th

1
Lea Lacroix (WMDE) (talkcontribs)

Hello,

We are about to drop the mw.config.get( 'wbEntity') config value, that is deprecated for two years. Starting on Wednesday, July 24th, scripts that use this value may encounter issues.

I noticed that your script located on [[User:Dachary/DR.js]] is still using this value. I suggest that you update it, for example by using the hook wikibase.entityPage.entityLoaded (see an example here).

If you have any questions or need help, feel free to leave a comment under the related task.

Thanks for your understanding!

Reply to "wbEntity config value to be dropped on July 24th"

"Free Software Directory" entry für "Swift" (Q17118377)

2
LennyWikidata (talkcontribs)

Hi,

FLOSSBot continues to link Q17118377 (Swift, the programming language) to https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Swift "Swift, a free cross-platform (Windows, Linux, Mac) XMPP client written".

Could you adjust this behaviour?

Dachary (talkcontribs)

I will do so, sorry about the inconvenience !

Reply to ""Free Software Directory" entry für "Swift" (Q17118377)"

Utilisation de P554 comme qualifier de P1324

2
Metamorforme42 (talkcontribs)

Bonjour,

je tenais à t’informer, par rapport à cette modification ainsi que la suivante, que website username (P554) n’était initialement destiné à n’être utilisé qu’en tant que qualifier de website account on (P553) et pas en tant que qualifier de source code repository (P1324) (cf. website username (P554)).

Après, j’ai beau te signaler ce point, je n’ai pas d’alternative à proposer pour entrer les identifiants nécessaires à la connexion ; mais peut-être que du coup tu vas trouver quelque chose de plus adapté ?

Dachary (talkcontribs)

Si tu penses que c'est un problème, je revert cette modification. C'est une tentative d'éviter la multiplication des propriété dont la sémantique est identique. La limite est floue et c'est assez facile de se tromper.

Reply to "Utilisation de P554 comme qualifier de P1324"

Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey

1
Summary by Dachary

Survey done !

MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

(That message in other languages: العربية • ‎bosanski • ‎català • ‎Deutsch • ‎Esperanto • ‎français • ‎עברית • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎اردو • ‎中文 – ‎translate that message)

Hello!

Like some other community members, you are using Flow.

An increasing number of communities now use Flow or are considering it. Although Flow itself is not scheduled for major development during 2016 fiscal year, the Collaboration Team remains interested in the project and in providing an improved system for structured discussions.

You can help us make decisions about the way forward in this area by sharing your thoughts about Flow — what works, doesn't work or should be improved?

Please fill out this survey (available in multiple languages), which is administered by a third-party service. It will not require an email or your username. See our privacy statement.

Thanks for your ideas and opinions about Flow!

Trizek (WMF), on behalf of the Collaboration team, 11:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

There are no older topics