Open main menu

User talk:Galaktos

About this board

My talk page. Feel free to contact me about anything.

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Galaktos/Archive 1 on 2015-08-10.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

WMF Surveys, 00:49, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

WMF Surveys, 01:39, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

(That message in other languages: العربية • ‎bosanski • ‎català • ‎Deutsch • ‎Esperanto • ‎français • ‎עברית • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎اردو • ‎中文 – ‎translate that message)

Hello!

Like some other community members, you are using Flow.

An increasing number of communities now use Flow or are considering it. Although Flow itself is not scheduled for major development during 2016 fiscal year, the Collaboration Team remains interested in the project and in providing an improved system for structured discussions.

You can help us make decisions about the way forward in this area by sharing your thoughts about Flow — what works, doesn't work or should be improved?

Please fill out this survey (available in multiple languages), which is administered by a third-party service. It will not require an email or your username. See our privacy statement.

Thanks for your ideas and opinions about Flow!

Trizek (WMF), on behalf of the Collaboration team, 11:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)
  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

WMF Surveys, 18:56, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Summary by Galaktos

Pablohn6 complained that I wrongly reverted an edit of theirs. I unreverted it and apologized.

Pablohn6 (talkcontribs)

Hi,

I have seen you reverted my deletion about linux.org as official website of Linux project. I mean this . Why did you restored it? As fas as I know, linux.org is not related with Linux project officially, it is just a blog.

Galaktos (talkcontribs)

I’m sorry, I must’ve thought it was spam. I’ve reverted the revert.

Frysch (talkcontribs)

I think I created several and will create some more of this type of case (maybe even this exact one, again) while trying to absorb some information we have scattered on different wikipedias into wikidata. I intend to clean them up later all together. It seems to be the easiest way.--Frysch (talk) 10:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Galaktos (talkcontribs)

Alright… it looks like you’re making these edits with some sort of bot, could you perhaps document that, e. g. on your user page? I don’t like the sound of having tons of (unreferenced) statements with no idea where they were imported from.

Frysch (talkcontribs)

It's just the Autolist tool. Adding the properties without references with a batch editing tool to me sounds like a useful first step. In case I have to do the rest manually this saves me half the work. If you've got ideas on how I could leverage some automatisation for the second part of adding references to the claims that would be most welcome.

I've been looking around for references and at least for the programming language claims there is OpenHub with nice breakdowns of used programming languages for most of those objects. If you've got an idea how we can have some automatisation for locating the exact URL for each object and/or put it as reference with the property please let me know.

(I guess something like "source: Wikipedia" is as good/bad as just having no reference at all? And we usually have no information on the basis of categorization decisions in Wikipedia - have we? They seem pretty accurate, though.)--Frysch (talk) 12:30, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Galaktos (talkcontribs)
Reply to "redundant license statements"
Summary by Galaktos

Concurrent editing happened and was resolved

Harry Canyon (talkcontribs)

Hallo Galaktos, previously was the entry "writer" present twice ;). Best regards, ~~~~

Galaktos (talkcontribs)

Yeah, I removed one, you removed one – that was one removed too many :D It’s fine now.

Harry Canyon (talkcontribs)

I was wondering. Now hopefully everything is right. Have a nice day!

Summary by Galaktos

short chatter

Sjoerddebruin (talkcontribs)

Was already fixing, if you just waited two minutes... ;)

Galaktos (talkcontribs)

Alright, thanks :)

There are no older topics
Return to the user page of "Galaktos".